This essay has been submitted by a student. This is not an example of the work written by professional essay writers.
Philosophy

Philosophy Argument

Pssst… we can write an original essay just for you.

Any subject. Any type of essay. We’ll even meet a 3-hour deadline.

GET YOUR PRICE

writers online

Philosophy Argument

According to the article, Steven Hawking argues that ‘philosophy is dead.’ The first premise is that most of the fundamental questions about the nature of the universe cannot be explained without hard data (Matt, 2011). The premise is excellent since it is clear that science provides evidence while answering such questions providing the required proof. For instance, Hawking highlights that the data collected by space research is an example of an institution that dedicates its time and resources to acquire such information. However, philosophy fails to provide adequate data to prove its facts.

Argument Two

Hawking’s second premise is that philosophy has failed to catch up with the new science developments. Over the years, science has made various scientific breakthroughs that have changed the perceptions of people on various things. Technological advancements have also contributed to these discoveries, and philosophy has indeed failed to catch up with them (Matt, 2011). Hawking argues philosophy can hardly explain any of these discoveries, which gives an upper hand and reliable as well. The premise does not justify his conclusion since it appears to focus on a specific branch of philosophy, leaving out the rest.

Potential Problems

The first argument highlights that data is vital in science, and philosophy fails to observe it. However, in some cases, data could be unreliable, which would, in turn, affect the results of the findings.

The second argument highlights that philosophy is dead because it fails to catch up with science developments, especially in physics. Metaphysics is a branch of philosophy that deals with understanding nature, and this is the branch that has failed to keep up with the scientific developments based on Hawking’s argument. Therefore based on the argument, it fails to address other branches of philosophy like ethics, epistemology, and logic. As a result, Hawking’s argument could be wrong since what could be dead is metaphysics only, which does not make the other branches dead as well.

  Remember! This is just a sample.

Save time and get your custom paper from our expert writers

 Get started in just 3 minutes
 Sit back relax and leave the writing to us
 Sources and citations are provided
 100% Plagiarism free
error: Content is protected !!
×
Hi, my name is Jenn 👋

In case you can’t find a sample example, our professional writers are ready to help you with writing your own paper. All you need to do is fill out a short form and submit an order

Check Out the Form
Need Help?
Dont be shy to ask