Women’s Rights Movement of the 1960s and 1970s
Introduction
The women’s rights movement was geared up by several feminists in the united states of America. The key drivers of this movement sought to bring about changes in law-making processes, eradicate women discrimination and, hence, provide women with chances of equal opportunities in all the aspects of life. Besides, evidence from the availed primary literature pieces shows that these movements demanded equality in education, governance, representation, and employment. For instance, according to Rosen 2015), it is evidential that women live frustrated lives in society. Surprisingly, the Journal cites that most of upscale bars and restaurants in America never served women unless in the instances where men escorted them. In a similar context, Rosen (2015) reveals that many colleges in America could not allow women to graduate in such programs as medicine, economics, engineering, and other affiliated sciences. Therefore, with this background information regarding the subject matter, this paper has been set to provide detailed analysis regarding support for and opposition of the women’s rights movement of the 1960s and 1970s while citing evidence from the assigned readings.
Support for The Women’s Right Movement (Ruth Rosen Article)
Support for the women’s rights movement was revived after the fifteen years of war and economic depression in the united states of America. Feminists, at this point, supported the women’s rights movements based on their personal experiences. According to Rosen (2015), it is evident that the National Organization for Women (NOW) was formed in 1967 to counter the provisions of The Feminine Mystique publication. In support of women’s rights, the organization provided support towards the attainment of equal opportunities for both men and women in American society. Factually, Rosen’s article outlines that the organization (NOW) promoted equality in such aspects development of equal pay for equal work and liberalization of women from such injustices assumed marriage (legalized rape) and exclusion of women in the central American stream. Further, evidence shows that radical feminists protested instances of stereotypical views concerning female beauty and representation of women on the media as sex objects.
Based on Rosen’s article, it is evidential that the women’s movement accomplished multiple achievements in the overall welfare of women in America. For instance, in 1964, evidence from this Journal shows that the campaign led to the creation of such institutions as the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), which primarily helped in investigations concerning complaints of both racial and sexual discrimination in different social contexts. However, due to lousy leadership led by its managing director, it stimulated women to start flooding on the institution in demand for changes to be made to improve its performance, particularly on handling racially based issues.
The National Organization for Women (NOW) was formed with the central objective of addressing such issues as sex discrimination in which EEOC had failed to address. In this context, the historical statistics from Rosen’s article reveals that women who supported the feminist movement typically risked their government jobs to address such women-centered issues as sex discrimination in the nation’s capital.