Lynch argument on  the failure of Arab

Lynch argument on  the failure of Arab

It is hard to establish the major cause of the Arab Wars leading to many speculated conclusions. The cracking of the Muslim world may have risen from Tunisia after the terror act in Tunisia igniting hope and a people’s rebellion across the Arab world. Apart from that, the cracking could also have resulted from America’s decision to take part in the Baghdad’s war which led spawn insurgencies that spread to Iraq and eventually Syria. The local wars in Yemen, Libya, Iraq and Syria are becoming proxies for bigger conflict. Understanding The dynamics of the new Arab wars have outweighed the rationale of comprehending the cause since the wars have brought hope and create a transition process towards democracy. Lynch’s book, The New Arab Wars, reviews the causes and dynamics of the wars proposing that the failure of the Arab Uprising will lead to creation of more democracies in the Arab World and there has been an increase in violent ]conflicts since the rising of Arab Springs in nations like Syria and Libya.

Lynch argues that the failure of Arab springs will to creation of more democracies in the Area. To understand this, Lynch reviews the Arab wars in Libya. Libyans were fed up of the rule of Muammar Qadaffi and created rebellions to overthrow the leader. As Lynch notes, in 2011, Muammar Qadaffi declared war against the rebel groups that had settled in Benghazi. However, the international community decided to offer help to the rebel groups which aided in the overthrowing of Muammar and the end to dictatorship rule. Aid from the international community brought hope in Arab nations which were under an authoritarian rule. Therefore, more Arab nations have organized rebellions and ways aim at fighting dictators.

According to Lynch, Libya’s War provided the first blood cautionary narrative angst fighting for democratic change after dizzying success of protesting movme3nt in Egypt and Tunisia. Lynch makes two conclusions: The intervention of NATO and the international community showed the Arab autocrats and protestors that armed insurrection had a likelihood of succeeding through luring external assistance. Apart from that, it made the Arab Pores realize that there were possibilities to convince Western Nations to further resolutions by the United Nations.

Based on the given reasons, civil wars and rebellions have spread across the Arab world. Lynch argues that the intervention of the United States created more problems in the Arab world that create peace. In Libya, civil wars and militia rule has become the dominant political environment. The transition of Democracies in the Arab world has proved unsuccessful leading to more unstable democracies like Egypt. Rather, the reorganization of rebellions will always lead to the end of authoritative rule until there is a complete change in Areas political system.

Lynch affirms that since the Arab uprising, there has been an increase in the civil wars and client conflicts in Arab nations. He also states that he still expects it to increase in the future. As noted above, the external help from NATO offer protesters and autocrats hope for help. The expectation to get external aid and help from the international communities compelled religious groups to use violent ways of fighting authoritative regimes. Therefore, the increase in violent conflict results from the fight towards a democratic state with the expectation of earning international help.

Lynch argues that since 2012, everything appears to have gone wrong. The uprisings appear to be more successful at the destruction of the status quo rather than establishing better alternatives. Uprisings in Iraq, Libya, Yemen and Syria shattered beyond repair. Likewise, In Egypt, uprisings transformed an autocratic system into military rule that is politically unstable and internationally illegal. The uprisings tend to new unleash a new wave of radicalism and sectarianism that significantly shapes and reshapes the nation’s identities.

The political culture of the Arab world has also led to an increase in war and conflict. Notably, Arab leaders tend to hold on power until they are overthrown or removed from power. As Lynch argues, autocratic leaders have a single-minded pursuit and strategy for survival, which is the root cause of the instability in the Arab world. This survival strategy ends up fueling the regions conflicts and extremism. Therefore, provided the political system is autocratic, rebellious groups and regimes always reestablish then launch attacks and protest which will always lead t war. Therefore, the existence of the autocratic leadership will always lead to violent conflict which has been on the rise and are still expected to erupt in the future. Lynch argues that it is hard to ascertain when a movement will arise but it is undeniable that one will arise in the future. Therefore, as long as the leaders in Arabic worlds remain autocratic and hold to power there is still a great likelihood of violent conflict. The factor that the political structure is established by the uprisings is also rooted in jihadist, it is more likely that the conflicts will always arise.

Lynch’s Book offers an in-depth and comprehensive analysis of the root causes of the Arab uprising. The book assesses popular movements in Arabic nations and how the international community responded. A great strength of the book is how it vividly shows how the failure of the Arab arising will lead to creation of more democracies. To start with, he shows the influencer of external assistance from the international politics fuel the uprisings. Lynch shows that Obama’s intentions were not to offer solutions in the Arab world but fuel a transitional process of the region.

The author’s ability to connect External or International community’s intentions and participation and how it fuels up uprisings which create new political systems through armed conflict. It is the participation of the US in Libya’s wars that have led to the increase of the uprisings across the Arab World. Lynch makes the readers understand that the participation of America in killing and overthrowing Qadaffi, created a new light and hope for a transition to democracies through armed conflict.

The book also enables the readers to understand how the democracies will be changes by showing the changes in political structure and framework. The book offers a wide coverage of torture transitions across the Arab world. It offers a framework for comprehending the region’s new politics, offering a detailed explanation of what is the root causes were and also offers a suggestion on what should be expected. He shows that jihadist is a major cause of extremism it effects tend to last longer even after the destruction of a state. Therefore, as long as Jihadist movements still prevail in Arabic worlds, violence will still be arising.

Another major strength of Lynch’s book is that he offers a vivid insight into the new uprisings showing their state and causes. It is evident that uprisings aid in shaking autocracy a foundation which offers regional democratic change and offer hope. However, these uprisings are characterized by civil wars which tend to strengthen the Arab world’s conflictual environment. This conflictual environment is then fed by sectarian divisiveness and the rising to power of the fundamentalist group. Lynch enables the readers to understand that the effect of conflict experienced during the democratic process has intensified. This makes it hard to attain democratic rule on these nations that broke out of autocratic rule.

A major factor that make Lynch argument sound and informative his observation that jihadist will always be a major threat to the transition process towards democracy. The rise of power of fundamental groups that use religion as a tool to attain political goals is a major challenge. The use of religion to attain political goals is used to influence young ‘people to work to political freedom, which aides in the radicalization of youths and creation of rebel groups. By addressing the issue of Jihadist and religion, Lynch pinpoints a major issue common in the Arab wars.

Another major strength of Lynch arguments is that they do not focus on finding the solution to the problem in the Arab world. As he notes, the Arab wars can be perceived as a process towards democratic rule. Notably, he addresses the causes of the war and examines the state of these wars. As Lynch notes, these wars cannot be solved by the international community. However, by their occurrence, they change the political environment and will eventually assume democratic rule with tie or after many years of wars. Therefore, Lynch perceives the wars as inevitable. He shows the belief that once the democratic process spreads on a solid basis in the Arabic world, it will spread to neighbouring countries and leads to a successful democratic country.

A major weakness of Lynch books is that it does not offer an effective way of solving the current issue in the Arabic world through enhancing effective transition to democratic regimes. Lynch downplays the utilization of social-economical approaches to enhance the effective transition to democracies. Such a strategy would entail the modernization of the public sector and elimination of elite capture to ensure that emerging political and economic interest I the transition phase will not obstruct implementation of policies. Chile is a vivid example of nations that have managed to maintain peace transition. Rather than just addressing the causes and dynamics of the wars, Lynch would have proposed a strategy that could be effective in aiding this nation’s transform to democracy more peacefully.

In conclusion, it is vivid that Lynch’s book offers a vivid explanation of the Arab Uprisings. The book shows how the participation of the United States and the international community in the overthrowing of Qadaffi, the new Arab war assumed another route. This offered hope to attain democracies through the use of violent conflict as well as the aid of external powers. However, the political structure of the Arab world and jihadists movements make it hard to attain full democracies leading to increase in uprisings from time to time.