Forensic Psychology

Forensic Psychology

The justice system involves a total understanding of legal responsibilities and principles about testimonies and witnesses in a specific area. The criminology system, therefore, involves these systems of justice and forensic psychology that involves the study of fundamental principles such as jurisdictional concerns, witnesses, insanity, and criminological competence to prosecution and trial. In some countries, for example, the united states, the justice system defines madness as a component in one state to enhance interactions between attorneys, legal professional, and  judges. Significantly, forensic psychology involves the ability to provide real testimonies in the court of law to formulate psychological conclusions and findings. The witness and the application of legal languages in the courtroom includes essential information to enhance complete understanding to the legal personalities, credibility in the provision of witnesses and knowledge of criminology and philosophical standards and rules (Rogers, 2016). Psychology must have a clear understanding of the  criminology systems, exclusionary practices, and the hearsay evidence to maintain the credibility of forensic psychology in the court of law.

Generally, the justice system allows forensic psychologists to carry out their training sessions in all branches of psychology, such as clinics and other social and legal organizations. Ideally, a forensic and psychological expert increases their reputation and experience due to the increase in the number of their areas of expertise. Neuropsychologists in forensic psychology appear in the courtrooms to discuss issues that directly relate to brain damage and measuring of individual competence in standing before a trial (Solomon, 2018). The forensic psychological court’s deals with distinct questions on psychological blows where the responses must be answered in the language that the courtroom understands. In a case where the court appoints forensic psychologists in the assessment of a defendant to prove her competence in a trial, the same court must also select forensic psychology to take part in the evaluation of the defendant’s states of insanity or sanity during the occurrence of the defendant’s offense. Also, forensic psychology must be able to translate all the psychological facts in a criminological framework.

Education and Training

Forensic psychologists provide essential information, recommendations, for example, the sentencing of the defendant, treatment, and all material facts requested by the court that involves evaluation and assessment of defendants credibility. Forensic psychology may also include assessment and training of police officers and other law enforcement individuals. In some countries such as the United States, a forensic psychologist must have legal certifications such as state licenses or psychological diploma in social, counseling, clinical, experimental, and organizational psychology. Ideally, forensic psychologists must have postdoctoral and psychological supervision and training in criminology and forensic psychology (Solomon, 2018). On the other hand, the legal practices vary from one state to the other by the legal systems. For example, the judge may become the ultimately authorized personnel in determining the most qualified expert in forensic psychology.

Law Enforcement

The forensic psychologists take part in the enforcement of the law. They work together with the law enforcement systems such as the police in suicide and post-trauma crisis and intervention. The  relevant agencies develop various programs such as personal and stress management for counseling and treatment of families on various ethical issues. In forensic psychology and criminology and justice system, the correctional psychologists work together with the offenders and inmates in correctional departments (Rogers, 2016). The correctional psychologists take part in the evaluation and treatment of the prisoners on parole and those on probation. These individuals also conduct research, psychological therapy, and testing expert and forensic psychological experts.

Evaluation

In forensic psychology, the evaluator evaluates various proceedings and parties that involve civil and criminal cases, particularly on the issues that relate mental health and damages. For an example in a criminal setting, the evaluators are called to evaluate the various problems involving the defendant’s ability and competence in the standing of a trial, their insanity and their future consequences of the occurrence of criminal cases and violence (Solomon, 2018). Evaluators, in a civil setting, mainly deal with the circumstances of individual families and accidents in the facts in the courtroom. The evaluation and assessments do not necessarily refer to counseling since all the activities seem to be nonconfidential. The evaluator has various employment setting, for example, psychiatric health centers and hospitals and performs training performed by the clinical personnel. The evaluators work closely with the expert witnesses to provide testimonies from the conclusions derived from the individual evaluations.

Generally, the fact witnesses testify what they observe and know, but the expert witnesses express their individual opinions from their perspective. Mostly, the expert witnesses deal with all issues related to cognitive, experimental developmental, and social expertise related to clinical matters. The experts perform various roles such as that of academic evaluation clinical and research psychologist (Solomon, 2018). They also serve the courts and their recruit, ents compiled by the court attorneys depending on the individual who invites the expert. All ethical and legal experts resolve all issues related to the case depending on the outcome and the expertise of the expert witness.

Psychological interventions by forensic psychologists provide treatment to various individuals in the courtroom in both civil and criminal cases. In the case of a criminal proceeding, the treatment providers offer various interventions for imp[rove their competency when the court assess the incompetence of the offenders in a court of law. The treatment providers, therefore, provide mental treatment for the affected individuals, for example, the insane and minimize violence for those individuals at high risks of causing disorder in the future. In cases that involve civil cases, the treatment providers offer various treatment procedures and offenses such as divorce and other circumstances (Solomon, 2018). The evaluators and treatment providers provide perform similar roles with the forensic psychologists, hospital, and other health centers. In some cases, the forensic psychologists take part in the provision of treatment and evaluation of defenders as required by the court of law.

Conclusion

In a nutshell, Forensic psychologists carris out their activities in a legal setting in the courtroom and all the incarceration facilities. Significantly, forensic psychologists testify every prosecution in defense of the attorney in a state. Forensic psychologists standards may differ from those standards for clinical psychologists. The forensic psychologist performs the role of an advocate, and all the materials provided by the client should be confidential in the courtroom (Rogers, 2016). However, the evaluation of the client becomes difficult since the forensic psychologist does not obtain all the information of the client. In such a case, the client misinterprets the confidentiality limits despite the signing and warning of a release in the courtroom.