The nature of the Constitution that the country should pursue s
It is recommendable that the state adopts a similar constitution to that of the U.S. if the nation intends to maintain stability and not the British Constitution or any or any other. This is precisely so, due to the range of benefits the American Constitution presents. The U.S. Constitution has a set of articles that establishes the subsequent articles, which different regions can follow regardless of their diversity. Besides, in the case that any given article in the Constitution is contradictory, a written constitution like that of the U.S. provides better reference and continuation records (Walker, n.d.). This is essential as it clears the underlying misunderstandings. In addition to this, having a written constitution as that of the U.S. guarantees that the leaders of the country and the ordinary citizens alike operate under the set legal standards.
Therefore, this means that everyone in the organization understands when they are not following the rule of law. There are, however, a set of problems that the country should brace itself for if it adopts a written constitution similar to that of the U.S. One of the most important problems is that formulating the Constitution is likely to consume a lot of resources including money and time (Walker, n.d.). It is appropriate to consider that, as the country is at the civilization stage, these resources might be used for other critical country outcomes, for example, setting up projects of economic worth. Nevertheless, it is better for the country to use enormous amounts of resources because the underlying costs are only experienced in the long-run. Sustainable benefits usually suffice in the long-run (Walker, n.d.).
The country should not seek to pursue a constitution like that of the U.K. The primary rationale for this is that such a constitution does not define the powers of the legislative, executive, and judicial branches of the government (The Lawyer Portal, 2020). Such a lapse is detrimental because it can potentially result in uncertainty, ambiguity, and potential conflict between the three government pillars. Apart from this, following a UK-based constitution implies that the country’s statute will be subject to numerous interpretations (The Lawyer Portal, 2020). The controversy with such an outcome is that dealing with matters of national interest might be intrinsically difficult.
The essentials of the Constitution
An effective constitution of the post-colonial African country would feature a set of essentials. Importantly, it is critical to ensure that the proposed Constitution is the supreme law of the land. This means that every citizen of the country complies with the regulations. An additional essential is that the formulation of the country’s Constitution is made up of a series of articles that embody the doctrine of separation of powers to the government arms, including the executive, legislative, and judiciary (Walker, n.d.). More to this, it is relevant to ensure that these governmental arms implement and enforces the laws and regulations provisioned by the Constitution in a manner that facilitates the proper running of the nation. A further essential is that the Constitution should personify diversity. As revealed, the country under focus is made up of three ethnic groups. Thus, it is fundamental that the state treats everyone equally, including giving each person equal opportunities regardless of their ethnic background. Hence, the Constitution should have articles guaranteeing fairness and equality.