National patient safety goals review 2019

National patient safety goals review 2019

2.Issues identified in the N.P.S.G. 2019

• The correct identification of patients highlighted in N.P.S.G.01.01.01 involves the identification of the problem.
• The patient name and the date of birth are the two means of identifying patients, which requires the utilization of the guidelines (Joint commission, 2019).
• Proving the identity of a patient having a minimum of two identifiers may not be enough.

3.The reason why the problem still exists

• Unless using a stronger identifier, some identifiers may not be sufficient.
• Systems relying heavily on the accuracy of the practitioner errors occurring could be high due to human error (Cohen, 2019).
• The identifiers are not as viable because the guidelines have not been specified.

  Don't use plagiarised sources.Get your custom essay just from $11/page

  GET CUSTOM PAPER

4.People involved in N.P.S.G. 01.01.01

• The lab personnel.
• The nurses.
• The data interphase designers.
• The clinicians and medical practitioners.

5.The role of the people involved in N.P.S.G. 01.01.01

• Accompanying patients to the procedure room.
• Helping trained and radiology personnel (Taieb-Maimon, 2018).
• The nurse provides continuous assessment and monitoring of severe complications.

6.Viable solutions

• The submit button in the E.H.R. systems should include the patient name.
• Adoption of a computerized order system.
• Highlighting a mandatory identifier that can be used with other identifiers (Cohen, 2019).

7. E.H.R. systems of N.P.S.G. 01.01.01

• It captures the state of the patient and stores the data accurately.
• It helps in ensuring the data is legible and accurate (Joint commission, 2019).
• It eliminates the need for tracking down previous patient medical records.

8. Adoption of a computerized order system

• The cost estimates from $3million to $10 for set up.
• As high as 80%, it affects error prevention range (Taieb-Maimon, 2018).
• It improves quality, and it is an essential technology for preventing medical error.

9. Action plan

• Individuals should be identified and included in the data entry, especially those checking the identity of patients.
• The patient tags should be incorporated into the database with all the viable identifiers (Taieb-Maimon, 2018).
• The medical practitioners and the patients should have effective communication, especially when filling the patient data.
• The entry system should use effective protocols.

10. Summary

• We identified an issue that involves the correct identification of patients, as highlighted in N.P.S.G.01.01.01 (Joint commission, 2019).
• The process may not be useful in the long run because it is prone to human error.
• The most viable solution is the adaptation of a computerized order system that has been identified.

11. Reflection

• I was able to learn more about the two ways of identifying patients in the medical field.
• More needs to be done to minimize the errors after I reviewed the identification technique.