How the State and Its Leader Attempt To Impede Citizens from Exercising Their Rights
The definition of tyranny is an aristocratic leadership with a leader exerting authority regardless of legal restraints. Different kinds of totalitarian societies occurred in the past, where the rulers would regulate every aspect of the life of the citizens. In this study, the author provides a good illustration of the famous Soviet Union dictator, Joseph Stalin. He ruled the Soviet Union for over twenty years. In the discussion, the author offers a description of how leaders from the state endeavor confining the governed citizens from exercising individual rights in culminating autocracy in contemporary societies.
Most rulers employ intimidation together with terror in ruling the citizens. Such contributes to scare and fear among the opposition members of the administration. The opposing persons fear that they may be held accountable for any undesirable occurrences in their areas or anywhere near the public places. If the government victimizes its people, then the moral foundations for authority and law deteriorate. Magstadt (2017) argues that the wrong kinds of political comportment in America are yet considered un-America. Joseph Stalin, for instance, employed trepidation on Soviet residents. He suppressed opposition philosophies besides disseminating propaganda. There was fear of death in each opposition member; thus, Joseph Stalin ensured that he used any chance possible to manipulate his authoritarianism on the citizens. Don't use plagiarised sources.Get your custom essay just from $11/page
In controlling people, leaders, besides impose suppression. A ruler might impede the rights of the people, especially when they are ignorant. Kuzio (2015) asserts that leaders with a desire to introduce despotism to citizens look for control of the information that the media distributes. Such implicates that the media only reports the news that is in praise of the tyrannical leaders concealing the information regarding the occurrences of the society. The excellent illustration is when Joseph Stalin signed a declaration hindering the broadcasting houses from airing news that the editors of the government are yet to scrutinize. The assassination occurred to those who did not heed the message.
In other cases, despotic leaders deny the citizens the right to rebuke the dictatorial government. A democratic administration consents both positive and undesirable opponents. Such is because the ruling has a privilege for each individual but not an entity for the rulers only. All citizens thus get to exercise the right to obtain information regarding the activities of the ruling party. Despotic leaders argue that it is a capital transgression to condemn the administration.
Two methods of curbing la totalitarian regime
Citizens need to ensure that they eliminate oppression, and one way is civic disobedience. Such implicates that the people fail to adhere to the oppressing rules of the government. If the citizens get to disobey the despotic government, then there is uncertainty in the society, and this hence apprehends the government. Zech (2016) argues that such conveys to the lose-lose condition where the citizens suffer as the administration loses. The ruling in this way inclines to the expectations of the citizens. The second method of hindering dictatorship is through propaganda resistance. The majority of the dictatorial rulers survive using propaganda-style. Such paints them in an outstanding depiction of the individuals of the society. The residents obligate declining acceptance of them and are on the lookout for such a form of publicity.
Components of an ideal citizen
A citizen with respect for the surroundings, law, and other residents and engages in the society and the community is a perfect citizen (NNPS, 2019). Ideal citizens maintain a better place for future generations and ensure that ethics, values, and principles prevail. Such citizens are responsible for effecting accountabilities to force the autonomous regime function. Each civilian needs to observe the regulations; in their country and even in other states, pay the tax, work in the armed militaries, a petition in court and act as jury associates.
Voter apathy consequences
The imminent leaders’ attempt on civilian’s privileges may contribute to voter unconcern. When there is voter apathy, it indicates that there is no regard for engaging in polls by particular clusters of electorates. One of the outcomes is little numbers on the voting day. The probable reason for voter apathy is the alienation and fatigue among voters. The tyrannical government thus offers services to the citizens who voted.
Techniques used by the state to control the citizens
One of the necessities that citizens require is maximum freedom, as the nation needs the highest power. People will rely on the government for services like education, safety, among others. Through the providence of civic education, then the state controls the citizens to get enlightenment on ways of taking part in the administration of the country. It ensures that the sovereign government is inclusive. The state also provides adequate materials vital in the voting process. Principally, they use billboards and crusades to inform citizens on the voting importance.
References
Kuzio, T. (2015). Competing Nationalisms, Euromaidan, and the Russian‐Ukrainian Conflict. Studies in Ethnicity and Nationalism, 15(1), 157-169.
Magstadt, T. (2017). Understanding politics ideas institution and issues.
NNPS. (2019). Characteristics of a Good Citizen. Retrieved from http://denbigh.nn.k12.va.us/characteristics.html
Zech, S. T. (2016). Between Two Fires: Civilian Resistance during Internal Armed Conflict in Peru (Doctoral dissertation).