religion as a cause of terrorism
Across the world the issue of terrorism has been a day to day topic of to many people but I reality terrorism can be defined in two ways. First, terrorism is the use of violence in order to purport a religion, political or ideological change. Secondly terrorism can be defined as the use of violence in order to scare people in a certain area mainly as a way of trying to achieve either a political or a religion goal (Ruby, Charles 14). But this paper focuses to discuss categorically religion as a cause of terrorism.
Majorly the need for a better understanding of actual relationship between terrorism and the religion is as great as ever. Furthermore, scientific inquiry can in some way shade a light on the actual truth of the complex relationship between terrorism and religion (Ranstorp, Magnus 62). Religion terrorism is indeed caused by religion or, rather that religion creates an imaginary supply of sacred resources over which humans contented. In fact all forms of social and political conflicts are always context over scarce resources. those without scarce resources are in need of them and ones with them want to keep them .here in religious conflict the scarce resources are mainly things that religion specifically supply that is to mean favor of God, salvation and blessings.in addition , these are not equally bestowed on everybody and at least must be protected and earned.[unique_solution]
Moreover, the necessity of violence is frequently built into that structure of religious commitment. Additionally, atonement act Christianity, Judaism sense of revenge, and triumphalism of Islam all requires brutal acts to fulfill their religious image of the world. For instance, in each case the result of violence is to bring the scarce resources of actually spiritual blessings to the grateful perpetrator of religious violence.
However, when one looks outside ones faith it is very easy to blame religion. Now, in the current climate of Muslim political violence, an America and European significant public sector assumes that Islam is the part of the problem. According to Ranstorp, Magnus (62) the implication of this general point of view is the unfortunate notion that the Islam in whole has supported act of terrorism despite cautionary words of George w. bush. The unavoidable attachment of Islam toward terrorism in the universal phrase Islamic radicalism is categorically one example this habit of thinking. However vaunting the term jihad to a place of supreme Islamic importance, in a way that Muslim agreed with its militarized usage by definitely unauthorized military extremist groups.
In addition the assumption of those who strongly hold the Islam is the problem position is that the Muslim entire relationship to politics is totally peculiar. Of which is not true. Even more and more troubling are strands of Christian so called theocracy that have emerged among extreme groups (Ranstorp, Magnus 62). Basically in USA, Some of them employ violence in their opposition to secular society as well as their hatred of a globalized culture and economy. However, despite evidence to the centrally, most of Americas public labels Islam as a key terrorist belief somewhat than Christianity.in addition if one does not assume that religion is responsible for act of public violence then the problem is taken by observers on the other side.
Finally from general point of view, people may view religion as an innocent victim while others may view it as totally being irrelevant. Now, religion should not be taken as the motive in most acts mainly of suicide bombing hence people should be keen on the issue of religion and terrorism which might be confusing if not keenly analyzed.
Work cited
Ranstorp, Magnus. “Terrorism in the Name of Religion.” Journal of International Affairs (1996): 41-62.
Ruby, Charles L. “The definition of terrorism.” Analyses of social issues and public policy 2.1 (2002): 9-14.