The Army Crew Team

The Army Crew Team

1. Why the Varsity team lost

The varsity team lost to the Junior Varsity team because JV was better in terms of the organization hence the excellent performance. Also, Preczewski, the couch of the Varsity team and his members, were overconfident, therefore, ended up underrating the Junior Varsity team (Snook & Polzer, 2004). Besides, the varsity team disregarded the unique fusion of different skills and members co-ordination hence lost as the competition as minor details were enough to distinguish the losers from the winners.

2. Solutions to resolve the problems

Couch P. needs to analyze the unique abilities of the team members during practice. The couch, however, selected the eight best rowers for his team, not considering the importance of synchronizing with teammates. Since there is no award for an individual performance, no one in the group should try to outdo the others lest the rowers’ game would slow down due to lack of harmony.

3. Recommended action to help the Varsity team

The couch should firstly work on creating harmony among the team members. Team performance determines the reward; thus, the eight members need to synchronize their rowing. For this reason, the couch needed to re-evaluate the selection criterion and consider placing together team members who will complement each other with unique skills and good team coordination.

4. The Army Crew team and organizational teams comparison

The Army Crew Team is similar to other types of corporate organizations because of its emphasis on team performance. In both, members need to work as a team and complement each other to realize excellent performance. Also, mutual support, as seen in Army Crew Team, which involves supporting each other’s effort in the quest to improve a mentality of winning (Snook & Polzer, 2004). Besides, both the Army Crew team and organizational teams require criticism and or acknowledgment to aid in self-evaluation. Contrarily, the Army Crew team is different from corporate units as there is no competition against each other in organizational groups. Members of an organization strive to grow as a whole rather than pointing individual mistakes.

5. Principles learned.

In this case, several management principles come into place. Firstly, in team activities, there should be simplicity, defining the role of each and everyone to help realize better performance. Co-ordination among team members in pursuit of success is also an important principle that ought to be considered by the couch (Snook &Polzer, 2004). Similarly, there should be clear objectives; the coach should set up the aim of the competition. Also, it essential for the couch to balance the team members concerning their unique abilities. Lastly, uniformity is equally a critical principle to build strong teams. There should be no different gaps between the team members to enhance teamwork.

6. Lessons learned about management.

Management calls for regular checking, evaluating, and changing the necessary areas. In management, decision making consists of a series of examinations like the case of the Army Crew team. Additionally, it is crucial to analyze the problem for non-performance, assess solutions to eliminate alternatives, thus provide the most suitable solution to the problem.

References

Snook, S. A., & Polzer, J. T. (2004). The Army Crew Team. Harvard Business School Pub.