Coney Island Image Analysis

Coney Island Image Analysis

            In the title Amusing the Million, Kasson takes a peek at an island that is now quite famous, the Coney Island. The author borrows the title from a manager of the lunar park which happens to be among amusement parks in the island. In writing the book, the author aimed at disseminating the facts on the advancement of fun shows at the beginning of the 20th era captured the variation in the character of the typical American and ethics throughout the liberal period. This notion is very well reinforced in the manuscript, illustrating on various facets of the nature of the average American and by what means Coney Island as well as fun grounds in totality transformed. Earlier efforts to fashion a delighted similar to Coney Island is stated, much like Columbian Fair of 1893 not forgetting Central park, and he describes these illustrations likewise signify variations in culture possessed by the Natives of America, or in the slightest tries to alter them.

Kasson uses a variety of sources and as well as indications all over his manuscript while in the slightest, attempts to embrace the detractors also supporters for the actions mentioned explicitly inside.  These different sentiments used to dissipate ideas that everybody settled into the narrative of the happenings in the manuscript. The writer moreover devotes ample time discovering the responses of diverse communal, economic, and social clusters to the perceptions and idea represented by the island. In his book, he scrutinizes the antiquity and the neoclassical manner begetting using historical research, images, cards, and old publications. Few usually prefer pictures, especially in the name of papers by writers as it tends to get murky in the dissemination of the intended morals. In This case, the author is not afraid to venture (Kasson $ John,1978) as he uses pictures to flair book lovers with a better idea and consideration of notions or spaces that seem intellectual or aloof when articulated over the printed exertion. Instead of taking away from the inscription, illustrations, as well as photographs, intensify the booklover’s delight of the effort and the booklover’s consideration on the subject.

An emphasis on the societal as well as the historical background has been put by the writer to press further. Kasson ought to be applauded for his capacity in shifting impeccably as specific events to persons towards broader much intellectual notions as well as principles. He ought to be commended for his capability towards supplying the frames of past literature through sufficient features guaranteeing jam-packed understanding besides involvement as of the booklovers short of trailing the ‘big vision’ beside the imperturbable objectivity imperious to a recent interpretation. Being fame that separates the writer’s exertion from approximately those supplementary “expressive” examines in the  Island becomes his consideration to the rise of frame philosophy and the general “social upheaval contrary. To discreet ideals belonging to perception besides demeanour” belonging to American social and vacation philosophy through the turn of the 20^th century. Kasson positions fun grounds as “workshops of the original frame philosophy.” He observes the 1980s to early 1920s as the dawn of the  Island’s liberatory piece.

Kasson observes the way people become “unconstrained from normative strains” whereas contributing to in festival values which delight and is presented by the Coney Island. The fun experience was inaugural to all classes and backgrounds throughout this retro as it had never before. A conclusion is derived from the book on the underpass from Coney Island to New York while revolution otherwise refining of the astonishing independence and novelty the interstellar crazed during its new ages. He achieves “A forerunner to the new frame philosophy; the Island lost its uniqueness by the very victory of its ideals.”

Reference:

Kasson, John F. Amusing the Million: Coney Island at the Turn of the Century, American Century   Series. New York: Hill & Wang, 1978.

Chapter III- Freaks film (1932)

Freaks film (1932) is an American film; it is produced and directed by Tod Browning. The film follows a trapeze artist who joined the group to seduce and commit a draft murder within the troupe to gain inheritance although he proves to have harmful consequences. The film is based on the elements from the spurs short story by Tod Robbins. The essay aims to talk about the two selected factor (Disability and class factors) as well as discussing the relations of the society of America in the early 2oth century.

Thesis statement: How the freaks film (1932) imitates early 20^th century assumptions concerning to features of both disability and conflict.

Disability

The film freak of Tod brownings has experienced regular frequency since it was released in 1952. The film was locked in MGM’s faults for many years little after experiencing failure within the box office in the United Kingdom although it was restricted until the sixties. In the areas, freaks fail to fill the traditional codes which govern the portrays of disabilities in most parts of the film. In the movie, people who were disabled were not shown as asexual. Throughout the film the disabled people are shown In situations which comprise everyday life Although the prevailing theme in the movie of holly hood consists people who are disabled, some disabled people are as a result of violent crimes.

In contrast, others are good people who were made disabled by others hence being forced to seek leverage; however, the film does not encourage such stereotypes to take place. The freaks film permitted people who were wounded to conduct avenge to themselves after the Cleopatra and the plot of Hercules of murder upon his fortunes. In the wedding feast of mirroring, Cleopatra was welcomed to be among their group although he did not accept the imitations where he spewed insults. Cleopatra, at last, joins and to be one of them; however, with a lot of sensationalized story as compared to all other guests.

McCoy and Crucianelli argue that portrays of film disabled people as dependent and pitiful; they decry the scenes which shows that they are competent and mature. For instance, Randion, who was a human torso, he lit his cigarette, and a lady who boarded with her young baby cited as poor performance. In some extent, there was a portray of disability within the film. However, it was accused of making disabilities into a spectacle, the film viewers were charged with making disability into a scene. The views were placed outside beyond the screening, which acted as a silent convey within the world of the films. The film is used to bring a clear message of how people in 20^th century are treated, how they are discriminated in most of the areas as well as showing how their rights are not observed since they have no voice of presenting themselves before the respective people.

Class Conflict

Freak film critic Mathews claiming that he caused interruption within the context of the great depression, mostly the story of the average people in American versus big people who are known to be the prominent businessmen. The film provides a clear image showing that the big people are personified by both Cleopatra and Hercules scorn the freaks. In such disdainful attitudes within the real-life social outlook of some business tycoons at the time of depression. The film studies academic of Jennifer Peterson similar identifies freaks as an example of an outside movie. Jane Nicholas comes up with a suggestion concerning the conclusion of a film where the performance of circus while of Cleopatra, where she says that chanting one of us is a reinforcement act of freaks social currency. It is a provocative statement which shows an inclusion if often cited as one of the embodies horror which reveals why the freak show persists. The film was as a sign of showing how in the early 20^th century people were classified. In real life, people are classified according to their class, that is if you are from a well up the background. Therefore, your friends and the surrounding will be from people of your course, and the same happened to the poor are classified according to their class. The film was to bring a message of how people in the 20^th century are treated.

In conclusion, the film was meant to bring a message of the real-life that is happening in the 20^th century. Considering the two factors, that is disabilities and class conflict; indeed, disabilities are not treated well, their rights are violated, and most of the people don’t care much about them. On the other hand, class conflict, people are classified according to their levels of capabilities and conflict occurs as a result of having a difference in people. Finally, the film brings a message to our nation that we should treat all other people equal despite our differences.