The History of Minority Population Being Jailed vs. Majority

The History of Minority Population Being Jailed vs. Majority

 In the United States, African Americans, Latino, and Hispanic represent the minority racial of the Americans population. The opposition has a history of being incarcerated in prisons across the country at a higher rate than the majority, which contributes to racial and ethical disparities in imprisonment (Vander, & James, n.p). Over the decades, the chronic racial and ethnic inequality in incarceration has been a well-known feature of the prison system, which includes very severe little consideration on jail term adjustment. These racial typists inject opinions about the minority people as always crime targets, unlike the majority of whites in the country who forms the least number of prisoners in the entire

region.

Minorities’ distinct offending time in court and their case being ruled with lengthy is a prominent issue since the variation of defense there is based on biased racial decisions and other individual aspects like level of poverty, education level, and unemployment history. This means that minority or superiority can influence substantial features of race, and ethnicity still dictates most prison systems despite the greater awareness on public (Sutton, & John, p.1207). Therefore a definite structural hindrance in communities’ superiority is still associated with high rates of offending and arrest. This business of the minority for fair treatment is caused by people’s perception of different races or ethnicity influencing criminal justice outcomes, which is a dangerous threat to public safety on people with a different color that resembles popularity.

The color of Justice, Racial and Ethnic Disparity in state prisons is an article that comes from an academic journal, which argues that most of the jails have more times minority people than the majority of people only to identify racial and ethical disparities in imprisonment. There are scales of this disparity and the standard drivers of variation, which for the aging and growing technology in minority groups. This article has provided the necessary knowledge for counselor skills development at different levels.

Expectations Prior to the Contact

Contact to the juvenile justice system can be understood in its level of disproportionate, but first, one racial and ethnicthe knowledge of racial and ethnic make-up of the adolescent population. The intergroup of the minority have a resulted anxiety of negative expectations about the outcome from interaction with the majority group (Johnson et al., p.1045). This negative expectation is derived from harmful prior contact with these groups; hence the stereotype of the minority group is activated when the judicial system or juvenile contributes to the avoidance of the minority group contact and prejudice against the group. An oriented response congruent with the minority’s perceived welfare since if the other is oppressed, it will provide that empathy people portray less prejudice; hence these prior expectations help to tend imaginative response on the fictional situation of life.

Reactions During

During the response, the minority experiences more impulse through obstructions coming from the decisions made. This mass confinement in the US is taking on prisoners and families; hence indemnity destruction from that can aggravate social discrimination through an adverse impact on unlucky children and families. Typically, these minority children face the stress that occurs when parents are incarcerated, making them have worsening mental health, melancholy, and post-traumatic stress syndrome expression. The country depicts a picture of discriminatory race and ethnicity, generally leaving the minority with anxiety, despair, stress, and substance abuse. To minority groups, discernment can be hurtful even if it is not intended to a target of a manifest act of bias.

Post-group Reactions

Group reaction comes with the effects that affect the whole community while the post group reaction begins with the design solutions that can help with the growing problem of discrimination. Intelligent and lenience dialogues about minority rights can encourage respect and indulgence amongst different groups in the society to absorb and conjoin one another hence preventing identity. Exercise of post group reactions ensures that people who are singled out of society in which they live get equal treatment, which harmonizes the relationship between the groups (Crutchfield et al., p.109). As a leader to get to a post-group reaction where you get to direct the group, you need personal warmth, bravery to negotiate with the government, and the ability to offend all animated groups as well. Developing a stable calming relationship with the government and other social groups can establish trust and prevent the shame of prejudice, which can entirely create public awareness to shift everyone’s attention to the discrimination issue of the minority.

In conclusion, although the US has made far much progress, it can remain a substantial race segregated nation residentially since it is not a surprise that poor people of color can be incarcerated disproportionately in increased imprisonment. Minority here has been marked mostly by color; hence the increased oppression is a result of legislative objectives to use intimidating motion with projected consequences to the minority group. The moment will call for active and accountable policing that will look upon the minority group and provide a durable response to all victimizations.

Works Cited

Crutchfield, Robert D., and Gregory A. Weeks. “The effects of mass incarceration on communities of color.” Issues in Science and Technology 32.1 (2015): 109.

Johnson, Brian D., and Sara Betsinger. “Punishing the “model minority”: Asian‐American criminal sentencing outcomes in federal district courts.” Criminology 47.4 (2009): 1045-1090.

Sutton, John R. “Structural bias in the sentencing of felony defendants.” Social Science Research 42.5 (2013): 1207-1221.

Vander Zanden, James Wilfrid. American minority relations. Ronald Press Company, 1972.