Review 3 scientific publications
You are tasked to review 3 scientific publications (i.e., publications in peer-reviewed academic journals) that report on original, empirical research (i.e., not a review paper, letter to the editor, or commentary). One of these should be chosen from the course paper reading list provided on Blackboard (I already picked a topic “anxiety disorder”. I have provided you with the pdf for it). You will then find 2 additional publications that relate to the initial paper. Additional publications can be found using online scientific databases (e.g., PubMed, Google Scholar). You should select only papers that report on original research. These include methods and results sections that describe, respectively, how the research was conducted and what the authors found. First, you should review all 3 publications focusing on the methods employed and major findings. Second, you will synthesize the 3 publications to identify and discuss common findings among them. [unique_solution]Third, you will identify and discuss at least 3 original ideas (i.e., your own ideas) of ways that work in these 3 papers is limited including how each limitation may influence the results of multiple papers. The limitations that you identify will be graded, in part, on the strength of your argument that they influence the results of multiple papers. Finally, you should discuss potential clinical implications of these 3 papers and/or future research that would build on them.