Comparing two articles about injustices behind colonization

Comparing two articles about injustices behind colonization

The United Nations General Assembly gave a declaration of the continuing colonialism in all the possible means after almost half a century that stirred several debates concerning the rights and wrongdoings of the colonial governmental sector and the legal matters about the entire politics. Many have a thought that colonialism injustices perfectly came to an end when colonized victims acquired political independence through the establishment of their supremacy in international laws and societies in the twentieth century. This notion, therefore, has made various calls for justice and reconciliation concerning the illegal activities and effects of colonialization that significantly calls out on establishing satisfactory attempts to tackle colonialism (Cathrine Lu, 2018). In a critical analysis of the injustices as a result of colonization, we focus on comparing two articles that are Research Justice and Critical Archival Studies. The researchers in the articles have employed the styles, ideas and images to enhance their writings.

Notably, both Research Justice and Critical Archival studies focus on challenges that face the marginalized groups in society as a result of colonization. The marginalized community, in this case, are the colonized and racial zed people as well as the disabled and gender and sexual differences (Coswell M. et al.). They involve developing critical historical analyses of moments and power formation while also working to center marginalized narratives, storytelling and lived experiences within the process of developing knowledge that can further struggle for social changes. Stacie m William articles and Jarred Drake help to create people archives documentary racial zed state violence in American Midwest. (Jolivette A.).

In addition, both articles seek to focus on the intervention to humanities, which has to soften been ignored. They look forward to restructuring these systems so to achieve a betterment of sense of the normal goals of the concerned ruling efforts. The aim of the article is to upgrade the normalized characteristics and approaches of colonialization and various injustices, with an eventual goal devising more normalized constructive features of the outstanding duties. For the achievement of this aim, political theories need to base prescriptive aspects of responsibilities for restructuring colonialism on experimental accuracy.

Moreover, both articles adhere that the western universals and European anti-feminist notion execute brutality to expensive and illogical thinking and relationship to the schedule and availability, severing the lifestyle from the bygone days while improving on various scientific disciplines epistemology which serves psychological critic bodily and physic way of learning what constitutes legitimate knowledge. This makes the past and our dead uncomfortable, to say the least. It creates too much distance between them and us in a way less real and less connected to reality (Jollivette A. ). Tonia Sutherland’s articles explore the irony of how archivists have let the white supremacy since they have failed to give a report of the ancient history killing in the United States.

The two articles are similar in the sense that research refusal becomes as important as justice-centred research methodologies (Simpson, 2007). Refusal, however, is often left out of our collective toolkit when speaking of Research Justice, as if to do research mindfully and by and for the benefit of the oppressed, we must always give up our ghosts and allow ourselves to participate in research. In the same way, the critical archival is rejected and criticized by the writers and the researchers

The two articles sought to investigate the figurative criminal act of survival where people seek to exist, get by and steal away towards freedom within the confines of the research paradigms that have been established for use by the market, academia, militaries, hospitals, missionaries, governments, colonials and do-gooders (Jollivette A.). The article by Christian Kelleher throws back on the social issues that affect the University of Texas libraries in alignment with the rights of individuals. It also focusses on how post customer archives theory democratizes and assortment annals by distorting the position of sovereignty.

Furthermore, the two articles seek to know the means in which supremacy is allocated evenly in the annals across the ethnic rift. (Coswell M. et al.). The research involves developing a critical historical analysis of the moment and power formation. It is also through research that domination and violence are justified and carried out via producing knowledge that legitimizes the accumulation of power through investigation. Therefore, the deep recognition of the power is deeply imbedded in knowledge and the potential for research to accumulate power over subject through extracting knowledge (Jollivette A.).

Furthermore, getting to know colonialization as structured injustices cause a modern behavioral change and governmental duty to change continuing structured injustices of international manner. The involvement in critiquing the modern customs of conciliation that aims at depoliticized ways of human well-off, majorly base their argument on the rivalry of unity or anticipate continual efforts for various transformation including social and political reforms. The report attempts to restructure the conciliation concept as a way to respond to isolation in structured, interacting and existing forms (Cathrine L.). The two articles help to critique the political and structural injustices that came up as a result of colonization.

The other involvement of the articles is to make corrections on the inequality in several documentations in international interventions, the political arena and also seeking justice. Specifically, the theory in the political arena and the worldly justice interventions, the persons working on justice have, with time, seemed to acquire the modernized state and the entire state system while they develop their particular theories as depicted by international contextual levels. The framework towards interaction that is common in worldly politics and authorized attempts to restructure colonialization, though, disrupts the archived records of the way colonialization were practiced and its operation and also the different forms of involvement that emerge (Cathrine L.)

However, the two articles possess several differences. Based on the topic of the articles, critically analyzed studies are the facts that try to give an explanation of justification along with the modern state of archival researches, including practices. On the contrary, research justice is the response to the colonial violence that both academic and popular research have perpetrated against. Therefore, critical archival studies seek to explain the injustices in society while research justice responds to colonial violence and its effects.

Additionally, in research, the writers have employed the use of storytelling, narrative as well as poetry to relate to reality. In this case, the stories become objects and evidence to be achieved and vetted for accuracy of facts losing their collective meaning. There is also the idea of neoliberalism. This has influenced the process towards ever-growing socialization that knowledge should be individualized and privatized. This is opposed to critical archival studies that investigate issues in real-life situations.

The research justices also employ the idea of colonial injustices to the environment as well as ecology. According to (Kyle W. 2018), the writer displays the way in which settlers’ colonialization commits collective injustices as a result of strategic diminishing native general continuance. From the knowledge of environmental injustices, the researcher gives a conclusion that shows how settlers’ colonialization give threats to a minimum of two types of environmental injustices against native peoples; brutal happenings. The point of view is that the analysis is the anti-native war that disturbs the existence of humankind with environmental features. On the contrary, the writer in the critical archival studies has not mentioned the relationship of the injustices to the environment.

Nevertheless, there is the idea of superstition in the article on research justice. The writer mentions the ancestors and the uncomfortable dead. He talks about the ancestors who agitated for as well as the dead who just lingers around and has an influence on the living.  For instance, our ancestors were fighting for justice; they will impact us also to continue fighting for the injustices that are there even after colonialism. Contrarily, the articles on critical archival studies have focused on just the intervention that can be done on the existing injustices.

The writers in the research justice write to show the dilemma that people face, especially in the media sector. We are confused about whether we are reproducing a power over situations or making power from below and building the capacity too autonomy is perhaps best explained by taking a look at our media work. However, critical analysis shows the way that archivists are the ones who are promoting injustices.

To sum up, all the parties involved in the behavioral or political enlighten of justice and conciliation ought to out-think practices of accountability and reparations, out-think the historical features and relevant for the affected people, and also beyond what the present local and international orders, when making clarification, formulation, and assessment of contemporary attempts to transform the various injustices in the worldly political arena. Based on the two articles, research justice and critical archival studies, the writers have expressed their views and opinions on the injustices behind colonization. They have employed different styles of writing to bring out the main ideas to the readers. To some extent, the issues addressed are similar. Both writers have criticized the fact that white supremacy, power and knowledge have affected the social injustices. Besides, the two articles differ in the sense that the writers used different techniques to bring about themes. There is the use of superstition in research justice, where the writer has brought the issue of ancestors and the uncomfortable dead. In archival studies, the writer has employed irony to show how the archivist act undiplomatically—all this aim at criticizing and the manifestation of the effects of colonization on the marginalized groups and regions.