Data is a Fingerprint
The title of the document is “Data is a Fingerprint: why you aren’t as anonymous as you think online.” The author of the article is Olivia Solon, an American, female technology reporter for the Guardian residing in San Francisco, California. Olivia is a Caucasian white whose career as a journalist was established in the University of London and Oxford. The document was published on July 13, 2018. The document that is based on the newspaper account about technology and scientific issues. The report was obtained from ‘The Guardian’ newspaper on the world issues of development.
The article develops ideas based on data privacy and intrusion. It is observed that the Australian government exposes the data that later is re-identified. It is indicated that more than 2.9 million records of medical bills were released (Solon, 2018). Therefore, it is then stated that when the University of Melbourne conducts research and realizes that data has re-identified and revealed the medical history of the patients. It was later revealed through the article that the Australian government attempts to remove the information from the internet happened with more than 1500 downloads noticed (Solon, 2018). Don't use plagiarised sources.Get your custom essay just from $11/page
The document is published at the time the Australian government reveals on the medical billing records of the tremendous number of patients in an unknown number which later contributes to the re-identification and exposure of their medical history. The author addresses the anonymous data that provide to data intrusion to be sent through the location data using fingerprint. She expounds on the issue of anonymous data released whereby in the US the identities of more than 87% of the population can be identified by the birth date, zip codes, and gender (Solon, 2018). The solution to the issue is focusing on making the subjects of such data anonymous rather than the date itself. Words such as privacy intrusion that are connected exposure of individual identities into the public are common in recent times. Moreover, the privacy law that has been existent over time in the various companies is comprehended today among individuals.
The existing issues regarding data intrusion and privacy complexities are significant in developing an understanding of the document. Therefore, the privacy violations, especially one based on Massachusetts visits in the hospitals by the state employers can be used to create further understanding of the document. The theme of data privacy and intrusion is linked with what happened in the 2016 presidential elections can be connected to the author’s subject. The Cambridge Analytic Facebook ads are known to have breached data of most of the users in the Trump campaigns to influence their decisions.
It is right to establish that document seeks to build on the issues of privacy of data and the violations that are common among institutions and state governments. The author manages to develop a clear perception that the individuals are focusing on making the data anonymous rather than the subjects. The articles make references to various examples of data intrusion and privacy issues; hence, portraying it as a relevant and reliable towards the issue discussed. However, it lacks any form of detectable bias.
In conclusion, the article makes reference to various privacy issues of data among individuals that have been experienced in the US. The state of Massachusetts complexity that led to the release of patients’ information (Solon, 2018). Moreover, it indicates the percentage of Americans that are exposed to the risk of having their identities exposed within history. It is significant as it enables one to discover about data privacy, intrusion, and violation as well as the solutions. The information about fingerprint location data as a local identifier and the Australian data re-identification about patient medical history is the most reliable.