Networks or Non-State Actors
The networks are groups of related individuals. Members of systems share common goals or values and tend to miss the centralized organization. They are independent. The new interface in international relations stands on their own. Both the civil and uncivil network mean group interaction in a state. They have the advantage of not being controlled by the government. For example, activists can represent human rights, climate changes, and immigration issues. They advocate favorable regulations and policies for the immigrants in Europe. These networks in the community, do not influence by the government; this gives the advantage to present issues against the oppression of the minority without disruption.
The new network has established a room for the weak and minority to present their opinion. The activist criminal network and terror network stand for the rights of the opposition. For instance, the catholic of the northern island encountered oppression for many years. The catholic activist is always at an advantage to fight against oppression and discrimination. Therefore, they have the power to air their opinions and ideas. Some of the new networks are r illegal means. Activists and criminal networks are mostly financed, or gain monetary gain and power through unlawful means. These groups support their operation with illegal funding from corruption with the aim of the successive mission. For example, the transition organized groups are claim based, some of which are opposition groups in the government. They carry out illegal operations and demonstration and protest gain funding from corruption funds from political or other means.
The new network encourages discrimination in society. In international relations, some of these networks fail to meet the propose by paving the way for discrimination of minorities. Besides these groups gaining populate, some of which widen the gap between having and haves not. The networks tend to pay many concerns on one side of the group that merging them to a team.
The new network encourages discrimination in society. In international relations, some of these networks fail to meet the propose by paving the way for discrimination of minorities. Besides these groups gaining populate, some of which widen the gap between having and haves not. The networks tend to pay many concerns on one side of the group that merging them to a team.The new network encourages discrimination in society. In international relations, some of these networks fail to meet the propose by paving the way for discrimination of minorities. Besides these groups gaining populate, some of which widen the gap between having and haves not. The networks tend to pay many concerns on one side of the group that merging them to a team.The new network encourages discrimination in society. In international relations, some of these networks fail to meet the propose by paving the way for discrimination of minorities. Besides these groups gaining populate, some of which widen the gap between having and haves not. The networks tend to pay many concerns on one side of the group that merging them to a team.The new network encourages discrimination in society. In international relations, some of these networks fail to meet the propose by paving the way for discrimination of minorities. Besides these groups gaining populate, some of which widen the gap between having and haves not. The networks tend to pay many concerns on one side of the group that merging them to a team.