The Dangers of Sex-Segregated Schooling
Gender-segregated education is a terrible idea. This is the general sentiment expressed by Jen Saunders in her article. She highlights how this system of education contributes to the poor social development of children by limiting their learning experiences and promoting sexism. Since single-sex schools promote segregation in education based on gender, they are the biggest culprits in imparting all the mentioned negative attributes to their students. The wri5ter utilizes several rhetoric techniques to effectively present her case and make it more appealing and relatable to the readers.
To strengthen the credibility of her argument and appeal to ethos, the writer refers to several sources. These include reports published by Forbes and The American Psychological Association, who both concur that gender segregation in education hampers the development of social skills in children and consequently negatively impacts their adult relationships. Her reference to the Federal lawsuit filed by the American Civil Liberties Union of Kentucky further adds credibility to her argument by appealing to logos. This case objectively outlines the logic behind the illegality of segregated learning. It objectively describes that sex-segregated learning is illegal because it “prevents children from equal opportunities in education and prevents students from benefiting from smaller class sizes, improved funding, teachers with better training and more parental involvement.” Her appeal to pathos is seen when she analogizes sex-segregated education to racial discrimination and racism. Such a parallel draws strong emotion among the readers and completely demonizes sex-segregation in learning institutions.