Discussion 3 On Education and Workforce Development

Discussion 3 On Education and Workforce Development

It is worth establishing that federal funding that is geared towards the development of the workforce in recent years has tremendously decreased. The increased entry in the registration of public institutions of higher learning has demanded extreme funding from the federal government. Therefore, it probable to indicate that the government seeks to fund student loans in the universities and colleges; hence, less is required to power the workforce development (Maneva-Sleimann and Bank, 2015). Consequently, the funding of the program has immensely declined in recent times in the United States. Furthermore, it can be developed that university education has demanded extreme financing from the government. The high cost of university education seeks to develop appropriate programs that will surpass the ones produced through workforce development. Hence, the reason associated with decreased funding.

Consequently, it is reasonable to maintain that the workforce development programs are associated with extreme significance as they are less costly. For instance, Career and Technical education enable an individual to attain specific skills that allow them to improve workforce ratings. It can also be indicated that college education is expensive to the federal government. The student loans that are given to individuals during their studies have contributed to the unfortunate working situation that exists in most states in America. Hence, it is appropriate to reveal the importance of workforce development programs as they equip low-income workers to improve; thus, having better payment. Therefore, the issue of poverty will probably be eliminated through the application and implementation of the programs. It can also be ascertained that college education demands higher costs as compared to the development programs in the society..

References

Maneva-Sleimann, B., & Bank, A. D. (2015). The Role of Community Colleges in Skills

 Development: Lessons from the Canadian Experience for Developing Asia.