Johnson’s Model in Marge’s Case

Johnson’s Model in Marge’s Case

Introduction

Johnson’s model is grounded on the assumption that the intervention of the close family members and relations could accelerate the need for an individual to seek intervention for the drug or substance addiction that plagues them (APA, 2017) The intervention assumes the tough love approach where, in the presence of a professional addiction adviser or any other health practitioner, an individual gets confronted about the effects of the substance abuse. The main purpose of this approach is to catalyze an individual’s need to seek medical intervention as opposed to the dominant assumption that addicts must reach a rock bottom for them to seek medical intervention.

The People who might participate in the Intervention

In the case of Marge, the husband and the close friends could be the ideal group of people that could be involved in the intervention. The Johnson’s model hypothesize that for the individual addict to feel compelled to seek medical intervention towards sobriety, the people who have borne so much brunt as a result of the behavior and the ones that the addict loves could be effectively used as part of the interventionists (Loneck, Garrett & Banks, 1996). The rationale behind the choosing of the husband and the close friends are anchored on the belief that their closeness to Marge could enable them wield power and influence Marge into seeking medical intervention towards the treatment of her addictive behaviors. The fact that Marge has ignored friends and disregarded her family will form a strong basis upon which her behaviors will be confronted.

Qualified Persons in the Intervention Model

There are range of qualified persons that could be used as an interventionists in the case of Marge. These individuals include; the professional interventionist, substance abuse provider, medical health provider, and any other trained professional in dealing with addictions. The professional would play an instrumental role in offering insight, support and encouragement as well as help the families in formulating an intervention plans together before the individual struggling with addiction is included in the general plan (APA, 2017). These professionals could also play a vital role in prompting the individual affected with addiction in getting treatments effectively.

The Preparation Process Prior to Marge’s Intervention

The preparation process prior to Marge’s intervention manifests through seven steps. The first step is to hire an interventionist followed by putting together an intervention team. The third stage include compiling evidence for intervention then researching treatment options. The fifth step is preparing the consequences for non-compliance followed by planning for an intervention meeting. The final step includes hosting the actual intervention.

Strategies that Participants might take in Marge’s Intervention

One of the major strategies that participants could use are positive confrontation, severing ties, and coercion to withdraw any support. Confrontation is done in a positive manner to push the individual into seeking a medical intervention towards the treatment of addiction (APA, 2017). Severing ties would be done in a bid to push the individual to make the addict feel that everything done to her is out of love and desire to see her change for the better. Coercion to withdraw support of the individual is an important aspect in cutting off enabling factors, making the addict to tear the line.

Three Potential Sanctions that Participants might Employ if Marge refuses Treatment

There are several sanctions that could be put into effect in the case of Marge when she refuses any treatment plans. First, one could be removed from family interactions to coerce them to avoid enabling addiction. Other sanctions may include withdrawing financial help and compelling the individual to vacate homes if they refuse any medical interventions.

Ethical Dilemmas that might arise from Marge’s Intervention

One ethical dilemma is that the intervention could be a recipe to the addict getting engrossed in further addictive behavior. For instance, getting rid of an addict by removing them from home could render them extremely immersed in the addictive behavior to a great extent, destroying all the probable gains that could have been achieved through counselling and other interventions.

References

APA. (2017). Johnson Intervention. https://www.apa.org/pi/about/publications/caregivers/practice-settings/intervention/johnson-intervention

Loneck, B., Garrett, J. A., & Banks, S. M. (1996). The Johnson Intervention and relapse during outpatient treatment. The American journal of drug and alcohol abuse, 22(3), 363-375.