Baby Euthanasia and Neonatal Euthanasia Permissiveness
Case 3 “Baby Euthanasia”
The exposition involves a baby girl born having a rare terminal disease. The girl had a metabolism complication, which caused a bone to form in her stomach. The girl’s parents Frank and Lisa, gave the best treatment to their child and finally became exhausted, seeing her agonize in pain. When she turned seven months, they decide to find measures of finding peace for their little girl and had to seek help from their doctors and opted for her to rest through medication.
The parents were incapable of hauling the child any more pain. They said they could not even hold their baby without it feeling immense pain. In a short time, the baby was alive, her life deteriorated, and her parents and physicians concluded she wasn’t living accordingly, and her wellbeing was at risk.
The wellbeing and state of the girl’s life had become worse in the months in which the parents observed her agony daily. Consequently, the advantages of accepting the baby to be put to rest were more than the resulting repercussions. In Holland, the law does not permit the euthanasia of babies, and many doctors are scared of undertaking the process as they can be in pursuit by the law.
Baby euthanasia is the procedure of putting an end to an infant’s life suffering from critical and extreme illness by concealing medications. This practice is illegal in most countries, but in later years, the Netherlands and Belgium have legalized the practice. Don't use plagiarised sources.Get your custom essay just from $11/page
View on neonatal euthanasia
The decree that neonatal euthanasia is socially acceptable is established on the Groningen Protocol standards. The protocol needs the person involved to be disturbing and in soreness. There should also be a correct discovery and verification by an external specialist, and the advocate should attest to the enormous pain experienced in grownups, which can be worse in children. Both the guardians of the ailing child are required to give permission and their acceptance for the procedure, as long as they are in line with the allowed medical standards (Appel, 2009)
The baby euthanasia is ethically and morally unacceptable. When a child is suffering from undeniable pain and has an incurable disease, the method can apply. With the child’s parent’s acceptance, the procedure of euthanasia is carried out in countries like the Netherlands and Belgium, where the technique is lawful (Modi, 2018).
Ethical implications of baby euthanasia
The infant euthanasia is developed for the babies who were terminally ill and with untreatable diseases (Verhagen & Janvier, 2015). The protocol’s primary purpose is offering relief from the consequences of the great pain experienced to the child as well as the parents. This act is ethically humane. A life that is not acceptable is non-exist, and where a child suffers gravely even from a single touch of its parents should be relived.
Baby euthanasia should be permitted, but only where there is no other solution, and there is no cure or medication to alleviate the pain.
Disputes on Euthanasia
The substantial enduring of a person’s diminishing existence can be minimized through a lot of assuasive supervision. Lack of sufficient maintenance can motivate the suffering patient to end his life and ask for euthanasia.
Life is sacred and should be treasured; thus, more concern and efforts should be dedicated to medical attempts to extend human life and restrain from carrying specific procedures when euthanasia is requested (Huxtable, 2007).
Young peers, as they are not permitted to vote, should also not be allowed to decide life and death. Their judgment on their wellbeing can be impaired.
The future implication for parents is guilt when a new baby survives from traumatized neurology.
References
Appel, J. M. (2009). Neonatal Euthanasia: Why Require Parental Consent? Journal of Bioethical Inquiry, 6(4), 477-482. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-009-9156-3
Dworkin, R., Nagel, T., Nozick, R., Rawls, J., Scanlon, T., & Thomson, J. J. (1997). The case for legalized euthanasia. The Philosophers’ Magazine, (1), 26-31. https://doi.org/10.5840/tpm1997110
Huxtable, R. (2007). Euthanasia, Ethics, and the Law: From Conflict to Compromise. Routledge.
Modi, N. (2018). Is Parental ‘Informed Consent’ Always Necessary for Research Involving Newborn Infants? 1. European Neonatal Research, 237-247. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315203157-18
The Belgian Act on Euthanasia of May, 28th 2002. (2002). Ethical Perspectives, 9(2), 182-188. https://doi.org/10.2143/ep.9.2.503856
Verhagen, E., & Janvier, A. (2015). Ethical Dilemmas for Critically Ill Babies. Springer.