United States Universal Health Care

United States Universal Health Care

Health is one of the main factors that contribute to the well-being of people, and consequently, it has a crucial impact on the economy of a country. Healthcare varies in different countries across the globe, but how people access health facilities is considered a critical issue both individually and collectively. Although the United States has not yet fully implemented universal healthcare, the government has ensured that 90% of citizens and above have access to health insurance facilities. From a pragmatic point of view, the United States of America’s government should provide interventions on health coverage and promoting universal Healthcare to all members of the society. The debatable question is whether the United States should establish a universal healthcare facility.

While there is no inadequate analysis that attempts to justify universal healthcare in the United States, it is regrettably common in bioethics and policies on health scholarship to presume the ethical justification. Over many years, scholars have tried or attempted to implement strategies on health care in the U.S. (Paul Starr, 2013). His analysis delineates the stakeholders who have a political and economic interest would be ill-served by any policies on universal health care.

Access to universal healthcare emerged after the twentieth century due to several factors such as the recognition of unmet needs for care among the poor. An investigation disclosed sickness and poverty, a cycle that was broken by adequate and timely medical care. Notably, some reforms on social insurance was an answer to solve the issues of unmet needs (Derickson, 2005).

In the discourse of discussing the need for the United States to have universal Healthcare, universal Healthcare is important to the citizens and the government. First, the government has full control of prices through regulation, simply meaning that having universal health care, the overall health care cost is reduced. Another need for universal health care is that it decreases the administrative costs, that’s doctor’s deals with one governmental agency. For instance, U.S. physicians may be seen spending more time as much as countries dealing with insurance companies. In an environment full of competition, health care providers should focus on profit; thus, universal health care makes doctors and hospitals to offer the same services at a lower cost. A further provision of universal health will bring equality to all citizens in accessing health services (“Why America Is the Only Rich Country Without Universal Health Care,” 2020).

On the other hand, universal health care brings some disadvantages to people. First, healthy people may find themselves paying for others. Also, some people are not financially stable to stay healthy; thus, individuals may overuse rooms for an emergency (Daniels, 2001). If doctors are not well paid, they may cut care to lower the costs; for instance, physicians report payment cuts will make them to most of the testing labs.

In conclusion, even though there is a need for health care for all citizens in the U.S., government effort matters. Primarily the issue of health care will remain unsolved in the U.S until the government sees the need for it. Human beings have a right to access universal health care services, and thereby from the practical perspectives, there is a need for the U.S. to have a universal Healthcare.

References

Daniels, N. (2001). Justice, health, and healthcare. American Journal of Bioethics, 1(2), 2-16.

Derickson, A. (2005). Health Security for all: dreams of universal health care in America. JHU Press.

Starr, P. (2013). Remedy and reaction: The peculiar American struggle over health care reform. Yale University Press.

Why America Is the Only Rich Country Without Universal Health Care. (2020). Retrieved 31 March 2020, from https://www.thebalance.com/universal-health-care-4156211