outcomes that are associated with stage 2 pressure injuries among critical surgical care
The main article focus is the outcomes that are associated with stage 2 pressure injuries among critical surgical care through conducting a retrospective cohort study. Hospital-acquired pressure injuries are always significant issues to essential patients of care. The objective of the article is examining the outcomes in critical care patients and identifying the different factors that are associated with the healing stage 2 hospital-acquired injuries. The results indicate that 4.7% of 6376 of essential surgical patients of care had developed stage two acquired pressure injuries.
The research questions of the article are examining the outcomes of stage 2 hospital-acquired injuries which happen to critical acre patients. Further, the research helps in the identification of factors that are associated with the known healing stage 2 hospital-acquired pressure injuries. The significance of researching the outcomes that are associated with stage 2 pressure injuries that happen among the surgical critical care patients. It helps in understanding the nursing care practices that can be carried out for stage 2 pressure injuries. It is significant since it helps in the identification of three risk factors that patients with pressure injuries should avoid. It helps in displaying the ration of the hospital-acquired pressure injuries that healed after discharge. Research indicated that 63% of the patients did heal after discharge. Further, it’s significant to study the problem since it reveals that nurses should be vigilant when handling and treating patients with pressure injuries that are older or have altered oxygenation and show signs of renal compromise.
It is a cohort study which includes a clinical research study where people under study have a specific condition like those that face hospital-acquired pressure injuries. The cohort study is done through retrospective cohort studies which entail some observational research where the researches use the past achieved and self-data, which is used in examining the risks and the causes of hospital-acquired injuries. The cohort study is done between the exposed and non-exposed patients.
Subjects of the study include surgical critical care patients, critical care patients that were suffering from HAPI as well as those under stage 2 of APIs and were older with over 40 years.
The limitations of the study are from its retrospective design. Researchers were only able to collect variables that were accessible through the EHR. The data collected could not ascertain treatment factors like dressing and speciality beds. Additionally, the researchers were not able to record the HAPI location, which indicated a limitation since location could have influenced the healing time. Through the reduction of individual’s with PI during admission in the effort of limiting the sample of patients with HAPIs increased business since people that had preexisting PIs. Further, patients that were in the healed group spend a long time in hospitals from HAPI identification of discharge as compared to patients that did not experience HAPI healing. This could lead to the introduction of biasness since patients that had longer durations of hospitalization took more time of healing.
Personal opinion of the article is that it gives a detailed evaluation of the study answering all the research objective hence very informative concerning the topic of focus. The impact of the study is that it gives information that can be used in determining how certain patients need to be addressed in case of hospital acquired injuries. Hence, it helps in describing the nursing care practices in case of a patient with stage 2 pressure injuries. Further, it helps in understanding all the risk factors and factor that determined the duration of healing of pressure injuries.