Ethics and proactive liberty

Ethics and proactive liberty

Ethics and proactive liberty are two correlated variables on the individual rights on procreation. Some scientists argue that people, whether married or single, should be live free from government intervention into matters that fundamentally affect their decision to bear children naturally or artificially. However, others argue that ethics should guide childbearing processes. The scholars differ on whether proactive liberty through means such as in vitro fertilization should be barely interpreted within the individual right to reproduce (Profeta, 2020). The critics to proactive liberty, however, raise concern over the important state interest on the matter, potential harm to other people, the status of parties involved, and the necessity of the right to be formalized. Serious considerations should be made before including proactive liberty under the constitutional right to procreate. Proactive liberty grants the right for personal choices regarding procreation. It captures the freedom for reproduction without sex. Importantly the term also includes the freedom to have sex without reproducing. The freedoms are recognized under the constitutional right to abort and control birth. There are social considerations; however, it may override proactive liberty. For instance, there has been a history of child abuse experienced in the children born from IVF as the parents may feel less connected to them. The practice also posed a threat to the children as some parents may bear more than they are financially stable to raises the practice is not tedious and gives fewer responsibilities that coital reproduction. Classifying proactive liberty under the right to procreate raises a mixed feeling in the U.S. Conflicting arguments erupt between those who argue for it and those who are against it on the basis of moral ethics. Specifically, on the reproductive use of IVF, proactive liberty may have both advantages and concerns. Consequently, important considerations should be made before interpreting them under the constitutional right to procreate. Precisely, IVF technology of reproduction should be made a fundamental right backed by the law of ethics. According to the argument presented by different scholars, it is important to have a constitutional implementation of in Vitro Fertilization (IVF) right. However, the right should have limits to its application. The technology should only be applied to individuals who cannot get pregnant naturally. Moreover, the technology should be unconstitutional to individuals who can get pregnant naturally. The reason behind the assertion is that despite the positive impacts of IVF technology, it can also have unethical impacts on offspring. For instance, technology can bring health complications for the offspring, which primarily affects the entire family lane. However, the urgent has overturned implications for those who cannot get pregnant naturally. It the right of everyone to have a child and reproduction complications can be outweighed by IVF technology. People should have the constitutional right to have a child to use IVF to get a child. Other negative effects of IVF should be held constant and pave the way towards enjoying the right to have a child. Most of the children born after IVF are likely to be born with abnormities is an argument made in favor of negative eugenics (Bergman, 2019).). The pertinent concern engulfed in the negative impacts of eugenics is that everyone feels happy to have a child without abnormalities, and this is not observed in the use of IVF technology. However, the negativity can be outweighed by the positive implications that IVF has the responsibility of creating thousands of happy families for those who cannot naturally get pregnant. The biggest concern emanating from the technology is that it brings equality between those who cannot naturally get pregnant and those who can. This is because everyone is subjected to the right to have a child irrespective of complications. References Bergman, R. L. (2019). Design of an experimental study of the dynamics of psychological wellbeing and maternal roles when using assisted reproductive technology of IVF. In Contemporary methodological guidelines and practices in socials