Inter-Organizational Behavior
To rebut the argument that history has no bearing on contemporary intergovernmental relations
It is false to state that history has no bearing on contemporary intergovernmental relations. Intergovernmental relations are defined as an interacting network of different institutions different in levels such as national, provincial, and local. These relations ensure that both relay services on to its citizens and enhance their mandate to people. This paper will be based on the topic argument that relates to the intergovernmental relations in the United States of America.
Intergovernmental relations in the United States of America are based on the federal state level and the local state government. The relationships are described as co-operative, conflictual, competitive, and coercive. In a reflection of back into history, in 1789, both federal, state, and local government officials saw it vital to co-operate together in different ways that enabled them to have a joint and separate objective that guided them towards their success. After a period close to the mid-twentieth century, the federal government then weak financially and policy-wise, which forced them to rely significantly on the state and local government levels to accomplish much of its mandate and objectives.
It is vital to state that intergovernmental in the United States of America has always remained fluid and informal to foster cooperation that bore fruits of service delivery to its citizens and leaders. A notable exception based on the Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental relations once was based on three members of President’s Cabinet, among other diplomats. It lasted for 37 years. Presently it’s also essential to confirm that through the development of such relations overtime for more than two centuries, they have made strong ties that are currently pushing the relationships forward. Through the early strengthening of such links at the beginning, intergovernmental relations officers and offices have been institutionalized based on their respective levels, which are federal, state, and local governments, to perform their mandate.
In conclusion, the process of different levels of government working together must be supported by strong legislative ties that have kept them healthy. Both houses, the Senate and the Congress, have had different committees since 1940s devoted to overseeing and monitoring this relation up to date. The committees have not only supported them in terms of legislative actions but also intensifying their workability in different sectors such as budget control and approval, which has made them exist up to date.