Eichmann in Jerusalem
The Extracts from Eichmann in Jerusalem presents reports and comments on the trials of Eichmann, a high ranking official in the SS accused of being involved in the Nazi’s genocide against the Jewish people in the 1930s to 1940s. He is held captive by the Israeli intelligence service and presented to the court for trial. The cultural context of Israel during the trial is portrayed, especially using the tone of the courtroom and introducing critical personalities with the first part dwelling on Eichmann and the rest covering the issues. The thesis revolves around Eichmann’s nature, who is portrayed as not being a sociopath but rather wholly unexceptional. His claims and jaded axioms portray a man without true passion for anything, which brings forth the essence of his character. The piece covers the tragedy of the Holocaust and presents the thoughts of the individuals lacking concern for their actions. Eichmann responds in the trial that he did nothing wrong, but in fact, obeyed the law and even went ahead to reveal how he has lived his life according to the moral precepts of Kant. The claim becomes outrageous as Kant’s moral philosophy rules out blind obedience. The extract further covers the consequences of Eichmann’s actions across various regions. Finally, Eichmann is found guilty of his actions and crimes against the Jewish people, and being a member of the Nazi and a death sentence is upheld.
One of the objections to this extract is the focus of the prosecution and the defense. They dwell on seemingly irrelevant questions on whether he killed with his own hands or if the crimes read to him can be excused as acts of state. The indictment, as seen, requires that Eichmann must have acted in full knowledge or out of a motive to justify the criminal nature of his actions.