difference between a boring job and an interesting one
The primary objective of the research is to determine the difference between a boring job and an interesting one. Another aim was to determine what constitutes a boring job and what constitutes an exciting job. The last objective is to determine the differences that exist between an interesting and tedious task. Also, this research uses a research model, which is essential in helping to understand the topic and how the interview should be. The research model used in this case is an explanatory one, and it is about since little research has been done before on the topic. Therefore, there is a need to explain various aspects of this topic in a detailed manner. Further, the model is not about offering conclusive evidence but rather about helping the audience understand the research problem more efficiently.
The research problem is that various studies conducted in workplaces across the world showed that a majority of the employees at the workplace were bored. In recent years, boredom at work has become a significant issue, and that is why firms across the world and particularly those in traditional sectors such as accounting and legal jobs, are trying to keep millennials engaged. Moreover, job satisfaction is directly impacted by boredom at work, and without inspirational leadership or a professional challenge, most young employees get bored too quickly. Therefore, there is also a need to look at what makes jobs exciting and the reasons employees find their jobs to be interesting. Further, with CEOs having also fallen victims to boredom due to the strict managerial and administrative processes that rarely change, there is a need to look at what makes the CEO Job interesting to other persons. The importance of this research issue is that it helps in ensuring there is an enhanced job satisfaction at the workplace and ultimately improved the productivity of a company.
There are also research considerations in this case, and one of them is that the research participants need not be subjected to harm in any way. Also, respect for the dignity of research participants is paramount, and the full consent of the participants has to be obtained before the research being done. Moreover, the confidentiality of the research participants should be ensured, and their privacy has to be protected. Likewise, communication concerning the study has to be done with honesty and transparency, funding has to be declared to avoid any conflicts, and any exaggerations about the objectives of the research needs to be avoided. Finally, the major limitation of the research study is that the sample size was too large, meaning that the results of the research could have been more accurate with smaller sample size. Also, there is a lack of previous studies in the research area; hence the research problem was too narrow. Also, the topic is complex since people have a different meaning of exciting and boring. Thus, the complexity creates barriers for the research and makes the data gotten inconsistent and one that lacks quality. The complexity mandates follow-up research to determine if the job is indeed dull or not.