Public disagreement about gun control in the United States of America

Public disagreement about gun control in the United States of America

Public disagreement about gun control in the United States of America has seen the government make policies to protect individuals owning firearms continuously. Forgetting that these individuals, at one point, not all of them, but a quit number do participate in mass murder using guns that commonly exist among American civilians. Controlling guns in the United States might greatly help to slash crime and save lives.

Firearms of high caliber, should not be legalized to be owned by American citizens, such as AR17 or 3G guns, should not be sold anywhere on the American market. These types of guns have the potential of killing a crowed. Firstly, why should the American government legalize ownership of a weapon that can carry 60 to 150 rounds to a law-abiding American citizen? The American government should step up and offer security to its citizens and not weaponries them.

However, several organizations have been seen not advocating for gun control in America, American citizens have, to a far extent, threatened by these organizations on what it terms as fear of the new gun laws. It’s the mandate of the government of America to cheap in and assures American citizens the importance of having these weapons regulated and its role to provide security and not threats to Americans.

Mostly, the American parliamentary system should check and rewrite laws associated with guns and other weapons that might endanger the lives of American citizens. It should note that one bullet in any riffle, stands for one entity to be taken. This riffles, however, they don’t take civilians’ lives by themselves; it’s the individuals who either own these weapons by law or unlawfully gain the will to take other citizens’ lives. Having laws governing gun control would at large save lives

The United States of America has the sovereign power and authority to nab criminals that possess these firearms and subject them to law, that should not just be enough, they should be punished by the federal laws too. Guns also to be placed under minimal instances such as sporty games and hunting, regulations and qualifications to use weapons in the mentioned activities should also have practiced at a closer look of the government

Many might argue that having a gun increases the chance of one’s security, the United States of America as a full working government, should instead assure its citizens that it is of more significant interest for any government to protect its people. Nevertheless, The United States of America should encourage its citizens to conclusively work together in flashing out criminals that pose a danger to citizens using guns that are not authorized.

Lastly, the government of the United States of America should closely work with other nations of the world in fabricating the ideas of having guns regulated. Facilitating good relationship that could foster development to each of the countries, this will mean that; citizens of another country, will not cross borders into the United States of America, to carry out an individual or mass shooting. The idea of any riffle that has bullets is to take lives if American citizens were to all own guns, then the loss of life will not be an option. Guns can only have merits while in safer hands.