The rise of china

The rise of china

The rise of china from an impoverished developing nation to significant economic authority in the last four decades has been striking. Following the start of the economic changes in1979 to 2017, the country has encountered considerable growth in the GDP at an average rate of almost 10 per cent Based on the world bank data; the country encountered the speediest sustainable growth by a significant economy in the history. The growth consequently lifted over 800 million Chinese citizens out of poverty. The drastic economic growth of China has also contributed to an increased bilateral commercial tie with the USA. The increased bilateral and commercial relations are evident in the USA trade data, which reveals that the total trade amidst the two states rose from $5 billion to $660 billion between 1980 to 2018. The rise of China as a significant economic authority has induced concern among several lawmakers of the USA on how to curtail the economic power of China. This essay is purposed to offer a discussion on the policies that the USA can use to reduce China’s rise in economic, political, and military dimensions.

The policy that the USA can use to slow down China’s rise in the economic dimension include mixed policy of using engagement summed up with assertive use of WTO conflict resolution guidelines to address the inequitable trade regulations of China. Likewise, it can slow down China’s economic ascent by increasing tariffs under Sec 301 to either react to the adverse effect of industrial policies of China on the USA firms or pile pressure on China to change their destructive and discriminatory policies. The mixed policy of applying engagement in conjunction with the assertive use of WTO conflict settlement guidelines mainly involve bilateral negotiations. The USA and China bilateral outcomes require to be verifiable, executable and market-based but not just a restatement of previous Chinese commitments like doing better on the IP protection along with technology transfer which represents unfair trade deals of China.

Furthermore, the WTO plus dedications should be negotiated in sectors like SOEs, cross border data flow and NME for trade remedy purposes. The implementation of the bilateral negotiation outcomes between the two countries should be done in conformity with the WTO dispute settlement mechanism. WTO provides universally accepted trade policies that offer a foundation for locating where China fails to adhere to the current commitments. The USA can use the policies to identify where Chinese actions violated the WTO rules but failed to be disciplined by WTO. Under the WTO, the USA can slow down the economic growth of China by seeking to work with China to reach on a consensus to a detailed review of China’s conformity with its WTO commitments.

Similarly, the USA can work through the WTO to ensure that China provides a full account of its SOE operations and subsidies as expected of any WTO affiliate and in accordance with its protocol of Accession. Likewise, a bilateral deal should avoid commitments by China to enhance buying of USA exports. Moreover, the negotiations on the bilateral agreement or the success of the discussion should not be dependent on the reduction of the bilateral trade deficits. The USA should, therefore, adopt the mixed policy of applying engagement summed up with the assertive use of WTO conflict resolution guidelines to address the inequitable trade regulations of China to slow down the economic ascent of China. There is a possibility of this policy being adopted by the USA to curb China’s economic rise due to its effectiveness in reducing the global economic power enjoyed by China.

The USA can also slow down the economic growth of China by increasing tariffs under Sec 301 to either react to the adverse effect of industrial policies of China on the USA firms. Sec 301 is among the principal statutory means by which the USA enforces USA rights under the trade agreements to tackle the issue of unfair foreign barriers to the USA exports. The procedures under Sec 301 apply to external act, practices and policies that breach or are inconsistent with the trade agreements of USA. Sec 301 would, therefore, assist in investigating China’s practices and policies on technology transfer and IP by determining the unreasonable and discriminatory practices of China. Hence, it will capacitate the USA to monitor and control the economic growth of China. The USA should, therefore, adopt the policy.

Likewise, the USA can slow down China’s political ascent by enforcing multitrack engagement policy together with the adoption of Asian regional policies that contribute to the outcomes the USA seeks regarding China. Under Obama’s administration, the USA carried out distinct multi- parallel tracks’ relationship between them and China. The government established China policy on an issue by issue basis. The policy enabled the administration to seek to enhance solid cooperation between the USA and China. In the course of collaboration between the two nations especially where interests diverge, and china pursues actions that induce direct or indirect costs on the USA, the administration seeks to counter and control the actions imposed by china. The multitrack policy can enable the USA to push back against the questionable actions of china without derailing the overall association between the two countries. The policy can assist in fostering engagement between USA and china while offering the USA the capacity to monitor and deter all the political actions of china that would consequently contribute to china’s political ascent.

Furthermore, the policy can enable the USA to constructively work with China while acknowledging that they have distinct doctrines that are not flawlessly arranged. The policy can also enable the two countries to operate along distinct tracks at the same moment, and this may encourage expansion on the cooperation of the two countries in one sector while challenging disparities and exchanging threats in another. The policy can also capacitate the USA to take steps that lower the risk of an unintended dispute with China and enhance the costs China incurs for her problematic behaviour, particularly where they have divergent interests. Multitrack engagement policy should be adopted by the USA to slow down the political ascent of China because it will enable the USA to impose stern actions on the problematic behaviour of china. USA will adopt the policy due to its effectiveness in reducing the global political power of China.

The USA can also slow down the political ascent of China through adopting the regional policies that contribute to the outcomes American seeks regarding China. The policy will enable the USA to have considerable bearing on the relationship with the Peoples Republic of China. It can allow the USA diplomatic and economic alongside military interest to remain engaged entirely in Asia. The USA engagement in Asia can help it to work with other countries in the region to confront the issues that arise from distinct sources, including globalization and the problematic activities of china. Additionally, the overall existence and engagement of America in Asia will significantly impact china’s perception and incentives. The adoption of Asian regional policies by the USA can make America to strengthen and maintain its existing associations while making appropriate adjustments in size and composition of forces to attain the transforming security needs. It can also foster the regional capabilities of America to address challenges like peacekeeping, disaster relief and counter-terrorism. The capabilities should be established to complement the USA existing associations with china having appropriate opportunities to perform a constructive role in the initiative.

The adoption of the policy can also support increased regional consultation and the development of local institutions on the basis that welcome full participation of the USA in the Asian region. The full involvement can considerately reduce the control china has over other Asian nations. The reduction of Chinese power and control over the Asian states can lower the political might of china, and this will resultantly enable the USA to slow down the political ascent of china. The policy should, therefore, be adopted by the USA to allow it to reduce the political rise of China. Moreover, there is a likelihood that the policy will be adopted by the USA help her curtail the political pressure induced by china and this will, in turn, assist in slowing down the global political growth of China.

The USA can slow down the military ascent of china through employing such policies as an army investment, engagement and alliances. The USA should apply military investment policy to strengthen its military capabilities and maintain a leading edge on technological innovations. It should invest in research and development and encourage top talent to work and stay in the USA while also encouraging collaboration across the civilian and military technology sector and with the allies. The policy can enable the USA to steep in the transformational USA army abilities in a portfolio strategy that offer suitable prominence on the highly developed aerospace and maritime forces together with special personnel required for other missions. The USA must also continue to foster the intelligence gathering and evaluation of the Chinese military. The military investment shall enable the USA to expand its army to army practices to forecast on collective action that might induce benefit to both nations. The collective efforts may include counter-piracy, humanitarian relief, peacekeeping and counter people smuggling. The investment in the military will enable the USA to produce more advance military weapons and ammunition, which will counter the Chinese military power. The USA should adopt the military investment policy to slow down china’s military ascent because it will help to produce more advanced weapons created through innovation to counter the weapons produced by China through technological innovation. Moreover, there is a likelihood that the USA will adopt the policy because of its effectiveness in curtailing the military growth of China.

The USA can also use the policy of alliances and security partnerships to curtail the military growth of China. The USA alliances are invaluable assets that allow Washington to control collective challenges against Chinese aggression. It also helps in shaping the outcomes of USA military operation in the global arena. The USA security partnership with various countries in the Asian region habitually offers the USA several strategic advantages which among them include ally’s willingness to consult, coordinate, and expand their policies to accommodate the interest of USA. The associates also provide access to the foreign bases that enable America to project its power far, while also contributing forces and political support for various USA endeavours. The security partnership with multiple countries will allow the USA to develop a secure military base due to the support from the partners. The strong army base will significantly help the USA overcome the Chinese army challenge. The USA should adopt the alliance and security partnership policy because it will boost its military base far much beyond the Chinese army power. By so, doing, USA shall be able t6o sallow down the military growth of China.

Finally, the USA can also apply the engagement policy to slow down the military growth of China. The USA can apply the military engagement policy to engage in the diplomatic talk with china to slow down the naval power. They can use the essential instrument of both engagements along with hedging, military-to-military contacts to establish mutual familiarity that can assist in avoiding miscalculations in the moment of crisis or military competition. The policy can also allow the USA to achieve value-based reciprocity in the military-to-military activities to help slow down the military ascent of china. China should, therefore, adopt the engagement policy to assist it in curtailing the military rise of China. The policy is effective in reducing the military ascent of China, and there is a possibility that the USA will adopt it.

In conclusion, China continues to poses a strong challenge to the USA, and this has contributed to the dominance conflict in various section of the economy. The USA is laying down distinct policies to curb China’s ascent in the political, economic and army dimensions. For instance, the USA can slow down the economic rise of china through a mixed policy of applying engagement summed up the with assertive use of WTO conflict settlement. It can also curtail the economic ascent of china through increasing the tariffs under Sec 301. Likewise, the USA can slow down the political rise of china by enforcing multitrack engagement policy together with the adoption of Asian regional policies that contribute to the outcomes the USA seeks regarding China. Moreover, the USA is required to apply military investment, engagement and alliances policies to reduce the military rise of China. Therefore, it is significant for the USA to adopt and implement various strategies to reduce the rise of China to quell power and global dominance dispute between China and the USA.