Scientific Study of Personality
Introduction
Personality psychology is one of the many branches in the field of psychology that analyzes personality variations among individuals. It is, therefore, a scientific study whose objective is to d denote how human beings are different due to forces known as psychological forces (Baumert, Schmitt & Perugini, 2019). Personality psychology is critical as it helps psychologists to determine as well as treating those with specific illnesses and helping them in the end to overcome such problems. The goal of this essay is to provide an overview of the definition of psychology, the different methods used to study personality and their advantages and disadvantages.
An Overview Definition of Personality
Generally, personality is defined as the long-standing traits and patterns that tend to propel a persons’ consistency in thinking, feelings as well as their behavioural features. Therefore, it is a set of behaviours emotional patterns and cognitions which have evolved from environmental or biological patterns (Uher, 2017). In Psychology, however, in as much as the terms are almost the same, personality according to psychologists are divided into four which include sanguine, phlegmatic, choleric and melancholic. It focuses on determining the construction of pictures of an individual in a psychological process, investigating individual psychological differences and the human nature similarities among individuals. Don't use plagiarised sources.Get your custom essay just from $11/page
Different Methods used to Study Personalities
There are three standard methods used in studying psychology which include Case Studies, Correlational Designs and Experimental designs at times known as true experiments. In case studies method relied on the primary detailed information analysis of the unique or interesting individuals (George, 2019). And since the individuals investigated are unique, in such a case, the assumption made is that the results may fail to generalize the rest of the people. It is a descriptive research strategy that incorporates empirical inquiry to investigate the phenomenon in a real-life situation.
On the other hand, Correlational Designs method of studying personality allows research psychologists to analyze the relationship existing between variables and the measurement used is often the correlation coefficient. Lastly, experimental designs method of studying personality in psychology ensures every element in of the personality experiment is manipulated into a single variable (Kite & Whitley, 2018). Hence it allows people available to attribute on the result to that of a single manipulation.
Advantages and Disadvantages of Correlational Designs, Experimental designs and case studies methods of studying personality
Method of Study | Advantages | Disadvantages |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In summary, personality psychology is essential through the various study method elaborated above in the table. Personality psychology has since time immemorial allowed psychologists to predict the way someone might respond in a given situation. That also adds to their preferred values that help them develop impressive trends in personality that help groups understand themselves.
References
Baumert, A., Schmitt, M., & Perugini, M. (2019). Towards an explanatory personality psychology: Integrating personality structure, personality process, and personality development. Personality and Individual Differences, 147, 18-27.
George, A. L. (2019). Case studies and theory development: The method of structured, focused comparison. In Alexander L. George: A pioneer in political and social sciences (pp. 191-214). Springer, Cham.
Kite, M. E., & Whitley, B. E. (2018). True Experiments. In Principles of Research in Behavioral Science (pp. 351-394). Routledge.
Krause, M. S. (2018). Associational versus correlational research study design and data analysis. Quality & Quantity, 52(6), 2691-2707.
Uher, J. (2017). Basic definitions in personality psychology: Challenges for conceptual integrations. European Journal of Personality, 31(5), 572-573.