A Non-Ethical Argument Against Parental Licensing
As all licensing systems have their imperfections, similarly, a parenting license also has some deficiencies (Philosophical Disquisitions). Probabilities are they exam might repudiate eligible people and mandate incompetent people (Philosophical Disquisitions). Let’s assume if the norm for issuing a parental license was too onerous, many accountable parents would become disentitled (A Non-Ethical Argument Against Parental Licensing, Pro-Fil). At the same time, if the criterion for granting a parental permit were too facile, chances are, many inadequate parents who anticipate to perpetrate child abuse and neglect would meet the essentials to attain the license (A Non-Ethical Argument Against Parental Licensing, Pro-Fil). This fact counterargues the point that parenting licenses would prevent child abuse and child neglect.
Another constituent that contributes to the debate that licensing parents is deficient is regarding the test anxiety. According to Verywellmind, test anxiety is the psychological condition in which people experience extreme distress and anxiety in test situations. Markedly, test anxieties can fluctuate from the time of the day and the schedule for the exam. To demonstrate, let’s say that you come from a long, tedious day of work, and you ought to go for your parenting license; you might flunk the exam because you were overstressed, and you couldn’t make the appropriate selections. However, you were capable of carrying out the test; it was just your anxiety and the time of the day in which you couldn’t elapse the exam. In some instances, some people might not be able to offer the examination as they might be preoccupied with work during that specific time of the day. For the most part, some fortunate inadequate parents might pass the exam by their unique capability of guessing the answers.
The implementation expense of the parental license may be too high. Notably, countries which would implement parental permit would have to finance additional support in the new administration which the program that’s executing the license system would charge (A Non-Ethical Argument Against Parental Licensing). Surly, a new administration would be needed as the parenting consent scheme would serve differently from the current system, which is the social serving system (A Non-Ethical Argument Against Parental Licensing). To enumerate the supplementary costs which are associated with the parenting license system, there are various examples which include, parenting courses, supervision and support, the tests, the cost of issuing the license itself, and the implementations of penalties for the offenders, and finally, the costs associated with potential lawsuits from the children who were abused by their parents who already had a licensing system (A Non-Ethical Argument Against Parental Licensing). The expense linked with the implementation of a parental license is too costly!