APA Analysis of William Shakespeare
Name of the student:
Institution of Affiliation:
Date:
A year in the life in the life of William Shakespeare
This is a book that analyses the life of William not as him but as any other person who would live a life of William Shakespeare as he lived and derived various things. It goes deep and derives the hemispheres which are generally the automatic royal world the large number of plays that William Shakespeare had to write about. The book goes deep and discusses the Essex and also his general downfall is also discussed. This summarizes how if one were to use the trend line of Shakespeare he would become among the top way excellent researchers this is because embracing on the significant plays that Shakespeare they were out of his in-depth research. Embracing this analytical research of William Shakespeare to the usual way of life any other researcher following the significant tips Shakespeare he could do his research on of the best studies (Shapiro, 2011).
Reference
Shapiro, J. (2011). 1599: A Year in the life of William Shakespeare. Faber & Faber.
The Psycholinguistics Semiotics and Metanormative Ethics of Suicide and Death in Shakespeare’s King Lear
Shakespeare being a play writer he had to depict many stories in various topics. On a question which he major insisted on is about the tragedy. This article describes how Shakespeare brings out the art of drama in his line of and the article goes on profound and analyses various misfortunes brought by Shakespeare in his plays. The article explains about adversity and how it is associated with death, Shakespeare explains this in multiple ways that he even goes further and depicts that for an end to happen, it must be related to the tragedy. He went further and gave more analysis about what he meant by tragedy being associated with death through the plays he illustrated. He goes deep and also associates tragedy in co-relation to suicide; he derives how suicide is brought by first about a person who may have faced various tragedies in his life that pushes him to think of committing suicide. Through committing suicide, then we see tragedy associating itself to death which is a significant being brought by the various plays written by William Shakespeare (Keinanen, 2006).
Reference
Keenan, N., 2006. Kuningas Lear [King Lear] (review). Shakespeare Bulletin, 24(2), pp.68-73.
Artificial Intelligence Reveals Second Playwright’s Contributions to Shakespeare’s ‘Henry VIII’
The article above reveals the play that was acted on the national theatre that relates closely to the tragedy plays written by William Shakespeare. But according to an interview conducted on BBC, the play was a collaboration between Shakespeare and John Fletcher, who was the successor of Shakespeare. The game which was acted on National theatre had brought a lot of attention to the audience which made it be a topic of concern to significant people who had a glance at the play about the tragedy play. This play brings out how William Shakespeare had a lot of creativity in his work that even before it was noticed it was his work there was still a sign of great work that had been by a person who was a profession in his work. Even though the collaboration of John Fletcher his successor, it shows how people who got into the shoes or followed the steps of Shakespeare had borrowed a lot of expertise from him in his great work of playwriting. It also shows that those who followed his line of work did produce not only ample work but also showed work that could also be used in the future (Second advanced course in artificial intelligence, 1987).
Reference
Artificial Intelligence, 1987. Second, an advanced course in artificial intelligence. 31(3), p.403.
Kill Bill: why we must take Shakespeare out of the classroom
This text condemns Shakespeare of how he wrote his work to put money in his pocket but not to impress or educate those who came across his work. The book goes on further and shows how Shakespeare wrote words that were only to be read and make him be remembered but not terms to educate. The editor says that everywhere is about Shakespeare which is a phenomenon that should be discarded. But through the considerable research, I have come to run about Shakespeare the editor of this text is very wrong in how he condemns Shakespeare. One thing Shakespeare came from a wealthy family means money was not a problem for him, and he did not write his articles for money. Moreover, Shakespeare wrote his plays not only to impress his work to people to shows people how to playwriting is essential in the way of life. We see how his work is being wagered by many people and also those who eager him the way they benefit from it and how they come to post better results of playwriting (Kill Bill: why we must take Shakespeare out of the classroom, 2020).
Reference
the Guardian. 2020. Kill Bill: Why We Must Take Shakespeare Out Of The Classroom. [online] Available at <https://www.theguardian.com/culture-professionals-network/culture-professionals-blog/2014/mar/17/kill-bill-shakespeare-classroom-theatre> [Accessed 20 April 2020].
What is the difference in writing style and organization between a peer review journal article and a magazine or trade journal?
In a peer-review journal is that it goes deep to review the work of Shakespeare, but in a Magazine, it is just highlighting the significant points from Shakespeare.
Does your news source seem trustworthy, biased and sensationalized? Why or why not?
Yes, it seems biased because the editor talks about Shakespeare does not prove any deeds done in the wrong way; this is because the main work of Shakespeare was to give a lesson.
Write a paragraph explaining the reasons why your unreliable source is untrustworthy.
The unreliable source is untrustworthy because the main work of Shakespeare was not to gather money from people but to give them a lesson from the significant plays that he presented to them. The reason why I say this is because Shakespeare came from a wealthy family, so there is no way that he was doing his work in need of money. And in his work, there were many lessons which had a lot of research showing that his work was not only to present any action but to also present work that was reliable to the people who came across it.