Army Profession and Ethics
Student’s Name
Affiliation
Course
Instructor
Due Date
Army Profession and Ethics
Commanding an army requires resources and mental capabilities that have to be incorporated effectively. The skills are vital in problem-solving and making sound judgment as a leader. Furthermore, an army leader should reason critically, ethically, and analytically before making any decision. The problem-solving process should also have an original map that outlines the possible outcomes. Equally important is the fact that a leader has to uphold impressive moral and ethical values. The values should act as a source of motivation to perform duty in a manner that is worthy of people’s trust. Therefore, a Sargent is expected to provide solutions that are both reliable and ethical. Although it is challenging to be a Sargent, it is vital to provide solutions that are both effective and ethical in case of a crisis.
Several ethical standards are to be upheld by an army leader. First, the army protocols emphasize stewardship and commitment. Stewardship dictates one care for the subordinate, peers, and other leaders throughout leadership (Blog, 2014). Secondly, every decision made is guided by an ethical guideline that safeguards the needs of others while sustaining the property. Thirdly, moral values inspire soldiers to be trustworthy and honorable during and off duty. Thus, the main aim of ethical standards is to ensure that the soldiers are motivated, inspired, and noble enough to make credible choices. As an aspiring Sargent, I will use various means to ensure that the ethical standards are applied in my command climate.
I will follow some procedures when creating an operation or command. They are, namely, screening, evaluation, recommend a plan, and implementation. First, the screening criteria ensures that the command is both acceptable and ethical. The command has to solve the problem both legally and ethically. Equally important is the fact that the resources available should be enough to materialize the plan. However, it is necessary to come up with a range of two to three options since it provides room for brainstorming and comparison. Secondly, the evaluation process is also required when selecting the most reliable operations process. The method of evaluation is necessary since it provides room for brainstorming and analysis. It also provides a description and summary of the operation with a breakdown of the required resources.
Thirdly, after the evaluation of the various plans. I will recommend a specific solution or operation. Markedly, throughout the process, the program ensures that the needs of my fellow soldiers are considered. Thus, the recommendations will vary according to the established loopholes. For instance, I might decide to change the line-up of my stuff. However, I will decide after consulting with the other affected parties. Furthermore, in the recommendation process, I have to liaise with the subordinate commanders to ensure that the plan is both practical and doable. Finally, implementation of the program will be required. As a commander, I will have to go through the final details of the plan before application. In the process, I will consider the vital factors such as time, audience, impact, and resources.
Generally, as a Sargeant, there are many obstacles, but it will be my duty to create an ethical working plan or command. The command will have to be informed, legal, and ethical. Thus, I will have to generate ideas from my other staff members before implementing any plan. Perhaps, that is why I will need to create a stable interpersonal relationship with my subordinate commanders.
Reference
Blog, J. F. W. (2014). The Army Ethic White Paper. Center for the Army Profession and Ethic.