Article Analysis: Campuses Are Place for Open Minds- Not Where Debates Is Closed Down

Article Analysis: Campuses Are Place for Open Minds- Not Where Debates Is Closed Down

Background Information: Facts and Thesis

The article analyses the rising viewpoints on cases students on campuses been restricted from free speech and open mind discussions. The case scenario of the event that happened at Emory University in Atlanta, where students raised concerns on a wall writing that to many subjected terms as victims of trauma, prejudice, and bullying, is the center for discussion. The big question is whether the Emory students where right in claims stated or the campus should allow the students to experience the claimed cases.

Background Information: Specific

The question of whether students on campus should be allowed freely offering options and holding a discussion on sensitive information is the center of the article. The case scenario provided describes how students have become more susceptible to free speech and free thinkers. An opinion expressed on sensitive matters is now termed as victimization way to the students. Unless campus re-invests in the creep concept in culture victimhood, Students will always feel fragile to sensitive discussions. Campus needs to be a place to nurture and develop free thinkers, rather than a place to lock resilience development.

Authorship and Purpose

The article, “Campuses Are Place for Open Minds- Not Where Debates Is Closed Down” was published in April 2016 by Jonathan Haidt, a professor of business ethics in New York. The rising debates on whether campuses in the United Kingdom should open forums for students to address their opinions or overprotect students from all kinds of victimization forms the central discussion. Jonathan Haidt develops an argumentative approach for the campus to weigh between allowing students to express ideas and opinions with no restrictions or to suppress all forms of free speech and liberal minds to protect students.

Article Summary

The article “Campuses Are Place for Open Minds- Not Where Debates Is Closed Down” analyses the rising concerns of campus students feeling traumatized, bullied, and victims of liberal-minded persons. In the case scenario offered, Emory students are said to have overlooked the events. The idea of just a wall writing “TRUMP 2016” only experiences an individual political view of presidential elections. As evidently supported in the article, most of the social and cultural victimhood have crept. In the current society, issues of less concern that one can deal with without rising alarms are now the center of the conflict. For instance, concepts such as bullying, trauma, and prejudice have crept, serving as a rhetorical weapon that causes students to yawn for safety and protection. Such cases only set public sensitivity and prevent discussions on specific topics that would be helpful and change both students thinking and society at large. Campuses need to allow students to suffer and endure all sorts of victimization as long as it does not cause extreme physical or mental injury.  It is only in such experiences that students can be capable of facing challenges, discrimination, and racism.

Author Success in Purpose

Jonathan Haidt effectively builds the argumentative discussion to address the situation in the campus on free speech ad over the protection of the students. From the analysis of concept creep and the alleged claimed rise by students in the case scenario at Emory University, students need to be allowed to freely offer opinions and raise open mind discussions to harden them and prepare them for life after campus. Overprotection makes students more fragile.

Success Evidence

Jonathan Haidt is successful in affirming his article thesis. From the evidence analyzed in the article, it is evident that campus needs to allow students to experience that pain of feeling victimized and endure the suffering to be capable of facing similar challenges in life after campus. Additionally, campuses need to be a place where students develop skills and knowledge in an open discussion such as politics.

Works Cited

Haidt., Jonathan. “Campuses Are Place for Open Minds- Not Where Debates Is Closed Down.” the guardian 10 April 2016: 5.