Case Study on Moral Status
Introduction
Abortion is an essential controversial topic that looks to be endless between the two separates parties. Countless deaths and severe confrontations have contributed to pro-life and pro-choice supporters to along and severe fights of who is right and wrong. Unfortunately, irrespective of what individuals believe, abortion looks to neither be right or wrong.
Indeed, it is by the matter of one’s conclusion that can say with conviction that the side they pick is right and the rival side is wrong. For the case study, you will discover Jessica concluding whether to proceed with her pregnancy or terminate it. Maria “Jessica’s auntie” is a pro-life supporter by which she utilizes her faith to persuade Jessica of keeping her pregnancy. Marco “Jessica’s husband” underpins his wife in whatever choice she makes with her pregnancy. At that point, you have Dr. Wilson, who examines the financial circumstance, continues with caution and gives options in which may support the family, one being abortion. This paper looks at the various theories that were used by Jessica, Marco, Mari, and Dr. Wilson to find out the moral status of the fetus. How the theory finds out or influences each of their recommendation for action, also my personal view on the suitable theory which ought to be used and its merits. Don't use plagiarised sources.Get your custom essay just from $11/page
The Christian view of the nature of human persons, theory on moral status and relationship to the intrinsic human value and dignity
In Christianity, human beings are all created in the image of God (imago Dei), and thus all have value and worth. It would be a non-utilitarian approach. Hence it doesn’t matter what your interests are, nor is it interested in any form of maximum pleasure or utility. We are humans. We only have value. God gives us value. Humans thus have an intrinsic value and dignity. This is not because of anything in ourselves but is because we are endowed with it by their creator God. The Christian perspective of the nature of humans persons is that they were created in the image of God. And since human beings are created in God’s image and therefore have dignity and value, those moral principles are worthwhile that uphold the sanctity of human life and declare it wrong to lie, cheat, steal and kill. Christian worldviews believe that if a human being exists, then they are life and that human life has value ad to cause harm or destroy it, would be a crime. Every human being at all times that he or she exists as a rational nature and thus is subject to fundamental human rights. The moral status theory based on cognitive properties. This involves cognition, awareness, perception, memory, understanding, and thinking. Self-awareness includes the knowledge of time, past, and future. This theory underpins that there freedom to act, and the capacity to engage in purposeful actions, the ability to provide, and appreciate reasons for acting. It shows a position to communicate with language and rationality and higher-order volition.
Which theory or theories are being used?
In the “Case Study: Fetal Abnormality,” Dr. Wilson is utilizing the theory of “cognitive properties.” This theory attests that is accordance with the moral status, an individual has to be in a position to clearly show some knowledge or perception of a situation, which is in this situation the unborn baby does not have. According to the theory of cognitive properties, the unborn baby does not have a moral obligation. This is of the reasons allowable to carry on with abortion. Maria, the religious aunt, attempts to persuade and explain to Jessica how favored she is to be a mother, so she cannot get rid of her baby that simple as well as how crucial it is to believe the Lord’s aim in our life. Maria is utilizing the theory of “relationships” because she feels like she has a powerful union with this baby as well as with God. Thus, providing the fetus moral status which makes terminating the pregnancy immoral. Jessica is also contemplating their financial situation as well as the Lords instructing on killing the fetus. At this time, she is falling under the “moral agency” theory. In this theory, Jessica can make a moral judgment on the rightness or wrongness. Even though the husband, Marco, will give acceptance to whatever decision Jessica makes, he is going to think of how he is going to care for this disabled baby. The theory which explains Marcos’s imagination is relations; this is because he is supporting Jessica, so the moral status of the fetus might change based on his wife’s decisions.
How does the theory determine or influence each of their recommendations for action?
The various theories additionally find out each of their recommendation for action in several ways. For example, Aunt Maria’s theory is that Jessica abandons the child and should not abort to allow God will be done. She proposes that this is because she is staunchly Christian and agrees with the values and principles of Christianity. As a doctor, Wilson understands the pain of losing an unborn baby. Nevertheless, he also understands that it would be very harmful to the mother to keep the baby having in mind the abnormality that it is diagnosed with. He proposes for abortion as the security strategy, which can be utilized to assure the mother’s life is not in danger. His theory, primarily from the onset, is that Jessica can have a secure abortion that is right as per the law, later on, they can still get another child who ought to be free good for the child. His recommendations are explicitly based on what the wife feels is the best option.
What theory do you agree with? Why?
From the perspective of a future physician, I would have to agree with Dr. Wilson in the no moral status category. Mostly, this does not mean that I believe every fetus ought to be aborted even though it should be based on a health and wellbeing point determined by the parents. What this does is permitting individuals a decision that is very strong for several people. Once that choice has been given, people boil it down to the decisions of if or not the fetus should come to terms.
How would that theory determine or influence the recommendation for action?
As discussed in the previous question, this theory influences the thought that fetuses that don’t come to term are excluded from moral status. This theory is incorporated in the action of an abortion, because it provides the parents with a choice between abortion and life. However, not as many women select abortion over life, it is still shown in this particular theory that there is another option. This theory does explain the choice of terminating a pregnancy; however, it does not insist upon termination but the option if required.
Conclusion
After reading this case study, it was proven to the writer that all four people involved all had differing options about the fetus. The doctor was trying to deliver medically what their situation was, Marco was trying to hide the data from his wife for feat she couldn’t handle it. Aunt Maria, with her strong Christian background, is distraught at the idea pf an abortion. Jessica is caught correct in the center of developing re suitable decision. In the eyes of Christians, abortion is wrong and immoral, and the writer believes which we ought not to destroy any of God’s creations intentionally. When we as nurse faces a case of this manner, it is crucial to keep an open mind and offer values with information for all options. Nurses require to ensure that their values and support system are in place when facing these situations as well. For as we are supporting our patients, we need to ensure that we are supported as well.