Secular Bioethics             Engelhardt articulates the absence of morality is the foundation of secular immorality that binds moral strangers and its least in principles (Engelhardt, 1996). He argues that bioethical controversies, which include human cloning, genetic manipulation, and embryo experimentation, illustrate different accounts of social change in people’s moral life. He explains how these accounts have different religious and secular moral narratives, which mean that their morals have many decent points that are either guided by medical decision making or public policies. Over the years, there have been contemporary political struggles regarding bioethics and preventive health care concern of how to accomplish medical outcomes at the same time establishing laws that embrace moral understanding and enacting affirmative public policies (Engelhardt, 1996). However, Engelhardt argues, without appropriate honest content, people will be unable to make proper judgment or decision. In this case, he supports the drafting of good Christian bioethics to guide public policies, medical professionals and scientist to appeal various notions which are biased and all accounts that act against natural acts for instance abortion. Bioethics seeks to shape medical…

Approach to Ethics The ethical approach that is most appealing to me is the consequentialist ethics. This is because it focuses on the highest good for the greatest number of people. In other words, it emphasizes on what benefits the highest number of people in society. It uses the potential consequences of a given action to examine its moral status. For example, a specific action is only wrong or right after reviewing the eventual results of undertaking it. Consequential ethics, therefore, focuses on the impact that behavior will have on the world, whether my behavior is doing more good or harm and whether my behavior is making the world a better place. Consequential ethics is the best known and significant moral theory in place because its core idea is that the morality of right or wrong action is a subject of their consequences (Beauchamp, Bowie & Arnold, 2004). And it is essential to note that the only consequences of actions are the good or bad outcomes that come out. I believe that the main intention of morality is to improve…