Importance of the constitution The constitution embodies the will of the people of the United States. The constitution gains its legitimacy from several components. The legitimacy of power falls under three perspectives. First is the moral justifiability of power relations. This perspective stands for the acquisition and exercise of power to the degree that can be justified. Second is the legal validity, which refers to acquiring and using power by following the existing rules. Finally, is the evidence of consent usually by the subordinate to the power relations. The three elements of constitutional legitimacy are first, the embodiment of the constitution or amendments on good and just principles. Second, the people whom the law governs should actively accept and give affirmative consent to the roots of the constitution or its amendments, and lastly, the constitution or its amendments should comply with and promote the rule of law. The constitution provides rules for its change typically. For the constitution to remain legitimate, the public must participate in its amendment in a formalized manner during its proposal and ratification (Jackson). The…
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, v. Jeffrey BING. No. 00 CR- 01234567. Fact: Jeffrey Bing, the defendant, had gone camping together with Newton and Geller. As the three approached their lodge while coming back from a hike, Newton joked that he had spent a weekend with Geller’s ex-girlfriend in New York. Yet, Geller was not aware that his former girlfriend had a current relationship with Bing. Geller became agitated and began fighting Bing using a knife. He used the knife to cut Newton on the arm, upon the latter’s attempt to separate the two. As Newton left the scene to ask for help, Bing took out his gun and pointed it towards Geller, warning him that he would shoot if Geller did not drop weapon (a knife) and stop the fight. Geller did not balk; instead, he continued moving towards Bing. Bing then shot Geller, leading to the latter’s death. Holding: A defendant has the right to engage in self-defense if he has reason to believe that he faces a threat from a far superior force. Rule of…
The Most Popular International Lotteries in Canada Playing the lottery gives you the chance to win millions in prizes while helping various charities. Best of all, it’s such a deeply honoured tradition that most people don’t even consider it as gambling. Playing the lotto is also easy. All one needs to do is buy a lottery ticket from a convince store or gas station. You can also play online lotteries, which are more secure than buying tickets. For one, you aren’t as likely to lose your entry as in the case of printed cards. The organizers of the draw also notify you via phone call, email or other methods after the draw. Here are some popular international lotteries to try out in Canada. The Canadian Lotto 6/49 This lotto is one of the easiest lotteries to play as it only needs three numbers. The results are published immediately after the draw, as is the case with superena and other online lotteries that you can play on your mobile device. The largest jackpot in history stands at $64 million. Lotto Max…
ILLEGAL EVERYTHING’ I have learned that law is essential, intellectually challenging and sometimes outrageous and the law is everywhere America has become a state where can know what is legal, you hear cases day by day about criminal trials, massive lawsuit or constitutional claim but seems that criminals are allowed to get off with it. Law very complex, and most occurred that no one can understand it at all, not even the professional lawyer. Law is not accessible to the ordinary person is like only the priests of some religion try to maintain the mysterious and inaccessible of law. People can learn what law for it clarify basics of law like the rules, principles, and arguments that lawyer and judges use.one of the law is mostly common encountered is speed limits, the speed limit according to the driver is considered higher than 65mph and legal act the same way. Drivers are cushion by police but never given a speeding ticket to someone who is going 66mph. If this happens, the judges will laugh at them in the court of traffic(Sheff,2019).…
Sacco-Vanzetti Case Nicola Sacco and Bartolommeo Vanzetti were two Italian immigrants accused of robbery and killing two employees of the New England shoe company. The two men were charged for participating in a robbery in South Braintree in Massachusetts hat lead to the killing of Fred Parmenter and Alessandro Beradelli during a robbery as the two transported payroll boxes belonging to the New England shoe company[1]. Despite several protests from immigrants and other interest groups, Sacco and Vanzetti were sentenced to death. The judgment was widely perceived as the most brutal and more of political oppression. During the early centuries, Americans feared communism. Thus both Sacco and Vanzetti were regarded as anarchists who believed in fighting the government using unorthodox strategies to make political statements.[2] Therefore, they saw as a threat to American democracy. Sacco and Vanzetti fought for social justice; thus, their trial was more politicized. Despite the fact that several eyewitnesses testifying the most critical issues was the ballistic test done on the murder weapon that proved that they were guilty[3]. Despite the use of primitive ways of…
The implications of Expo 2020 for Dubai’s real estate scenario There seems to be an upsurge in the real estate arena of Dubai thanks to the years of reforming the real estate policies to draw in the investors. The reforms seem to be working now that the investors are gaining their confidence back about the UAE real estate market. The initiatives that have brought about this change include increasing the flexibility of debt payments by the financial institutes, favorable plans for payment, and long term visas for the professionals and investors. It seems that the confidence of the investors started rising ever since the news of Dubai Expo 2020 was announced. This was good news for the real estate investors interested in the country because it was a sign of the potential of the market for attracting buyers. In fact, a couple of investors have already delivered projects worth multimillions of AED. And, the good news lies not just in the fact that they have delivered the project, but rather in the fact that most of these projects have sold…
Constitution The constitution of the united states established the national and common laws, and also guaranteed basic rights for citizens. Constitution vagueness is when the American citizens do not understand the laws regulated, prohibited conducts and how punishment is imposed. Vagueness can be seen when the laws or rights have a broad language and is not clearly defined anywhere. Constitutional vagueness can be helpful or a disadvantaged to the people especially in decision making. Vagueness extends into two clauses in the fifth and fourteenth amendments of the constitution(Williams, 2017). Vague constitutions have the following advantages; it encourages cooperation amongst political leaders. Political leaders work together to determine specific clauses through negotiation to ensure a democratic process. Vague constitution easily adapts to changes, the world is changing rapidly a specific constitution can create problems to social and political circumstances (Maxwell, 2013). Vagueness helps to prevent arbitrary enforcements of the laws; this is the decisions and rules are based on justice the disadvantage of constitutional vagueness it is used to nullify certain criminal laws and judicial decisions in the courts. These happens…
how the constitution defines the presidency of Donald Trump Rise of Donald Trump to power as the president of the USA in 2016 came as a shock to the majority of the Americans. The favorite of the Americans even as per the polls leading to the election predicted Clinton’s victory. After assuming the office of the president in 2017, President Donald Trump and other members of his government that he appointed have occasionally have made statements, acted in several ways that are considered antithetical as compared to the previous presidents and governments. Some people have alleged that some of these administrators’ words violate the constitution and the fundamental principles of the American constitutional tradition. This paper will discuss how the constitution defines the presidency of Donald Trump, considering all issues around him. There are efforts made towards the removal of President Donald Trump from office. To remove the president from office should be guided by the constitution. Two probable grounds can be used to get rid of the president from the power, which is the use of 25th amendment and…
The Zaydi creed of Imam al-Mutawakill and the Suni Creed of Adud al- Din- Iji The Zaydi creed of Imam al-Mutawakill and the Suni Creed of Adud al- Din- Iji has some significant differences. Even though the two creeds originate from two different spectrums of the Muslim religion, both creeds have some similarities in them. This essay sets out to compare and contrast the Zaydi creed of Imam al-Mutawakill and the Suni Creed of Adud al-Din- Iji. Generally, both creeds of Islam give general beliefs and instructions on how a Muslim must act and how powerful God is. The Zaydi creed of Imam al- Mutawakill and the Suni creed of Adud al- Din- Iji portrays attributes about God. Both creeds also cover vital topics in the Islam religion. The first similarity between the Zaydi creed of Imam al- Mutawakill and the Suni Creed of Adud al- Din- Iji is that there is recognition of God and his characteristics. The first attribute of God that both creeds portray about God is that God is sovereign and his perfection. The Suni creed…
The Exclusionary Rule and Good Faith Exception The exclusionary rule is rule derived from constitutional law, which prevents the government from using evidence that has been collected and analyzed in violation of the United States Constitution from being used in a court of law. This rule is aimed at ensuring that no person is deprived of property, life, or liberty without due process of law. The rule restricts compelling an individual to be a witness against himself in any criminal case. The decision established in Mapp V. Ohio that the exclusionary rule is applicable to any evidence gathered from unreasonable seizure or search in violation of the Fourth Amendment. The exclusionary rule is also applicable if evidence is gathered by ways in which the government violates the defendant’s Sixth Amendment right to counsel, and if it violates the Fifth Amendment by gathering indecently elicited self-incriminatory statements. This is a way of providing a disincentive and remedy for criminal prosecution from police and prosecutors who illegally collect evidence. The rule provides defendants with a defense that does not address if a…