Causes and Repairs of Boiler Tube Failure in Ships

Causes and Repairs of Boiler Tube Failure in Ships

Introduction

Several marine safety and risks are associated with the ship engines, including the boiler tube. A ship’s engine is a complex structure in terms of the machinery in it and the systems that operate the voyage on board. The marine boiler is one of the most integral machinery in the ship’s engine as it is used to perform different functions such as heating of fuel that maintains the engine. Moreover, the boiler tubes also carry risks that can be fatal if not identified and repaired on time. Enhancing the boiler safety on board is one of the interventions that the marine engineering operatives have perfected in recent times, with research and development approaches focusing on the boiler tube. This machinery can have catastrophic outcomes when it fails to operate effectively, thus culminating into the explosion, meltdown, scalding, and hot surface, among others. This can be dangerous on board, hence the need to underscore the potential risk factors and the remedies to ascertain the safety measures. Understanding the causes of the boiler tube failures and the maintenance and repair mechanisms forms the essential outcomes to reduce the fatal incidents on board.

Failure analysis for the boiler tubes in marine engineering occurred on board and often culminated in varying levels of calamities unless it is detected and addressed on time. Engineering principles that are usually employed in investigating the possible boiler tube failures include chemical analysis, electron microscopy scanning, visual inspection, and optical microscopy. In some instances, the engineers apply the energy dispersive spectroscopy to assess the situation of the boiler tube failure while on board. The evidence and indicators of ruptured tubes are carried out to ascertain the extent of damages that can create tension and eventual failure of the ship in a marine situation. Some of the microscopic examinations can reveal the state of the boiler tubes in the ships and inform on the action to be taken by the in-charge engineers. Based on such processes as oxidation, corrosion, and hydration, some of the chemical composition of the boiler tube wall can thicken or become thin, hence becoming a technical and mechanical issue. Boiler tubes often undergo gradual or sudden failures that can impact the performance of the vessels and the engine.

In most instances, it is caused by rupture or leakage, which is usually detectable during the operations. When the failure is not detected and addressed on time, then a possible lockdown or shutdown of the boiler ensues. The boiler tube is connected to other components such as turbines, headers, and pipes, which all contribute to the efficiency of the vessels within the principles of marine engineering and its operations. It is, therefore, integral that the crew and the in-charge engineers focus on the strategic assessment and supervisory activities to ensure that the potential risk factors to failure are addressed. In most instances, the professionalism and technicians employ the metallurgical root-cause investigation to ascertain the potential shutdown through failure and correct the mechanical impacts. An ideal inspection process or online monitoring is some of the perfect tools used to detect possible malfunctions. In this regard, the causes of the boiler tube failure and the repair mechanisms in ships must be underscored to avert the potential calamities.

Causes of Boiler Tube Failures

Marine boilers occur in different types and forms based on the size and purpose of the vessels. For example, there are water tube boilers and fire tube boiler that perform specific functions. In most instances, the boiler tubes applied for the high pressure, high capacity, and high-temperature applications. The design of the different boiler tubes depends on the application and the role it plays, such as small and medium motor ships. The typical characteristics of boiler tubes that should be analyzed by the technicians during the investigative for potential failures include the large furnaces, roof firing, and the water-walled turbines. For those in lower temperature zones, there are superheaters to accommodate for the deficit and maintain optimal temperature, pressure, and other conditions. Soot blowing and improving superheat control mechanisms are essential places to be checked for the boiler tube failures. Understanding the principles of operation of the boiler tubes within the ship structure is based on the critical assessment of the potential causes of failures. Some of the causes of failure of the boiler tubes in ships include feedwater line erosion, economizer tubes, overheating, corrosion, and cracking.

The causes of boiler tube failure mentioned require that the technicians and the engineers engage in strategic methods of limiting corrosion, erosion, and overheating. One of the causes of boiler tube failure in ships is through the deaerators cracking, especially along the welds and heat-impacted zones near the head-to-shell weld. The deaerators cracking is one of the most common causes of failures of boiler tube failures, mainly occurring below or above the water levels across the longitudinal welds. This is a potential safety hazard since the cracks can halt the operations of the system. There should be periodic equipment inspection to ascertain the existence of any form of cracks hat is environmentally assisted in most cases. In most instances, the technicians use magnetic particle testing to determine the presence of any sort of cracks. Another cause of boiler tube failure is the feedwater line erosion resulting from high-velocity water. This mainly occurs at the steaming economizers, especially along the hairpin bends. Such erosion across the feedwater line can also create regular thinning patterns when the sequence bends to create a potential increase in local velocity. This is usually addressed through effective maintenance of water chemistry to optimal levels.

Another cause of boiler tube failure is economizer tubes, which are susceptible to damages through oxidation. This usually happens at the economizer inlet, especially near along the weld seams. In most contemporary ships, the problem of economizer tubes is addressed through deaerating heater operations through the fast-acting oxygen scavenger. Some of the challenges to the effectiveness of the boiler tubes include the caustic soda accumulation in a process called caustic gouging. This usually occurs along the tubes where the stream generation takes place. Additionally, this problem can be caused by the fatigue cracking process and the corrosion process through condensation of acid that is generated at the boiler flue gas. One of the most studied causes of boiler tube failures in ships is through overheating and the essence of plastic flow. It is mainly caused by the sediments and deposits that remain and impact the overheating process. It usually required that an assessment of the process to determine the source of overheating is conducted. This establishes the long and short-term implications and how it is related to the failure of the boiler tube to operate effectively.

When water flows in the rubes in interrupted through any sort of blockage, then a heating process is initiated. The condition can cause an increase in metal temperatures for as high as 1600°F, which culminates in rapture. The gradual deposit buildup is usually the cause of such ruptures, and the pressure mounts on the boiler tube. However, the rapture is a product of the thinness of the wall caused by corrosion or erosion issues discussed in the past sections. The thin-lipped bursts are usually the epitome of such causes through overheating, especially when the deposits are responsible for the flow restrictions. The temperature variation can be responsible for the changes in overheating ranges, especially with the different thinning and corrosion mechanisms. The rapid firing rate when the boilers are starting up is also a cause for concern when it comes to failures through overheating. In most instances, the failure to install the metallurgical examination mechanisms in the system causes the overheating through the deposits, boiler start-up, and other mechanisms. These issues are directly related to the ineffectiveness of the boiler tubes when subjected to periodical and unexamined overheating.

Corrosion is another typical cause of failures, especially through the stress corrosion cracking. The transgranular or intercrystalline cracking processes for carbon steel can cause metal stress that creates corrosion. Corrosion causes severe damage to the boiler tube in ships and can be dreaded on board. It can result in leakages and other challenges to the operations systems. Moreover, the caustic embrittlement is a harmful form of intercrystalline cracking that results from stress corrosion. Some of the conditions that create such instances include the presence of sodium hydroxide in the boiler, the possibility of leakages or any other mechanism for concentration, and specific stresses in the boiler tube.  This is almost similar to the erosion mechanisms and other strategies that often impact the ship’s boiler tubes and create conditions for eventual and potential failure. The highlighted risk factors and causes of boiler tube failure can be prevented through strategic repair maintenance and other ideals. Consequently, it calls for constant and routine checking and investigation into possible corrosion, erosion, overheating, or cracking in the boiler tubes. Maintenance and investigative practices are the ideal interventions in this regard.

Repairs for Boiler Tube Failures

The causes and conditions that can cause the boiler tube failure in ships can be addressed the repair mechanisms to restore the operations and enhance compliance to effective operations in the system. Conducting the boiler tube analysis and assessment is the ideal process that can create the ideal information for the management and repair for the failures. Working closely with the designers, engineers, and the risk assessment experts create the ideal team for a collective understanding of the processes and ideals in the management of the failures. Upon the identification of the failed areas through corrosion, erosion, cracking, or overheating, all inspections must be conducted on the potential locations and adjacent tubes. This will give the ideal picture of the failed parts and resort to repair interventions that address the identified challenges. There is also the need to open the head hand and other plates for inspections to ensure that the issues of cleaning are assessed. In most instances, the failure is created by the chemical mix-up; hence the need to also focus the assessment on the transition points to correct the hiccups. This will ensure that the repair mechanisms are only limited to the exact problems.

Before the repair interventions are undertaken, the designer must be called upon to underscore the need for an expert’s input in the management of the failure. The designer’s first impression report will inform on the processes, necessary repair ideal, and whether the expert opinion and services are required. The analysis by the designer will explore the potential locations that caused the failure and also create the remedies to address it. The designers will assess the trend charts, log data, and other details such as water chemistry, heat situation, and water temperatures. On the other hand, the designers will give theories and practical approaches based on case studies through the correlation of the findings of different laboratory processes. The designer will also underscore whether the failure of the boiler tube in the ship is not generic. The results can be classified based on the material inadequacy, operational practice, or design. The main intervention should focus on the action plan towards addressing the tube boiler failures through an ideal operational guideline.

For certain failures, repair include the fitting of embrittlement detectors to underscore the possibility of the boiler having such problems. In most instances, sodium nitrates are used to treat and inhibit the boiler tubes against the embrittlement along the tubes in the ship. The operating pressure usually determines the ratios of the sodium hydroxide and sodium nitrate used to prevent such conditions and repair the outcomes. These are typically recommended by the Bureau of Mines and are meant to be precautionary measures in the management of the boiler tube failures. Upon the identification of the problem, the owners should be informed of the cause of the boiler tube failure, and the design guideline for the repair is undertaken. During the repair process, it is integral to monitor the boiler tube’s performance to ascertain the effectiveness of the corrective action. The interventions that are undertaken, especially after the boiler shutdown, should address the diagnostic outcomes. This begins with the opening of the man hole that is in the suspected area of failure.

Powerful lights should be used to determine the leaking or corroded parts of the tube to ensure that it does not hurt the performance and efficiency of the boiler tube. As mentioned, the opinion of the experts and working alongside the designer can improve the time spent on the management of the detail and the challenges. The strategic processes for repair intervention include taking photos of the sites where the failure is suspected through corrosion, cracking, erosion, and overheating. Other signals can include thinning, thickening, and leakages along the boiler tubes. These are the exact locations that are subjected to the required processes and ideals for eventual outcomes. For the suspected overheating incidents as the cause of boiler tube failure, metallographic analyses can be applied through the strategic processes and expert guidance to achieve the longstanding outcomes. This also includes careful examination of the sections and areas that are impacted or suspected to cause the failure. These repair practices are scientific and should follow the clearly articulated guidelines and frameworks to achieve the results. This is the essence of using professionals and experts in conjunction with designers.

Conclusion

Boiler tube failures in ships can be detrimental if not detected early for repair practices. In this regard, an assessment of the causes of boiler tube failures and the repair practices is ideal in addressing the deaerator cracking, overheating, leakages, and corrosion. Other causes that the paper has explored include erosion and economizer tubes that can create challenges to the operations in terms of efficiency and effectiveness before eventual shutdown. Moreover, repair practices for these causes of failure should come up with guidelines and strategies that include the designers and experts. This is to ensure that the ideal problem is identified and addressed in the long run without missing the concept and location. Ships and other vessels that have different makes, materials, and pressure for performance experience different causes of a boiler tube failure, hence the need to work with experts and designers in solving the problem. An ideal corrective action is one where the crew, experts, and designers have a common opinion regarding the cause of tube failure.

References