Comparative Analysis Essay

Comparative Analysis Essay

Introduction

Writing is an art that has existed over centuries. The artwork has evolved with development in the way human beings conduct themselves. Many writers have exploited the art of writings to pass their intended message to their audience. Unfortunately, the passing of a critical message through the art of writing requires the use of specific styles and strategies. The use of these strategies ensures a connection between the writer and the reader. Failures of proper use of these styles and strategies of writing can bland the passage of a message. About the art of writing, many writers like Franklin and Pollan have made great use of these writing styles and strategies. The article seeks to analyze and compare the different writing styles and approaches used by Franklin and Pollan in their artistic works.

Strategies and Styles Employed by Gawande: When Doctors Make mistakes

On the other hand, Gawande, in his essay-“When Doctors Make Mistakes,” seeks to explain to his readers about the greatly misconceived notions of doctor’s mistakes. The writer has displayed a high degree of writing strategies to try and justify the mistakes that doctors commit in the course of their duty. Gawande has employed a variety of skills in conveying his message to his writers. In his essay, Gawande has used sarcastic language to convey the message to is readers. Knowing that it is hard for the public to get along with the mistakes committed by the doctors, he uses their prior believes in teaching the public that some of these mistakes are unavoidable. The context of the scene is in the hospital. Some victims are brought into the hospital in very critical situations. The other strategy Gawande has employed the collection of points in a concisely sequential manner. The arrangement of ideas by Gawande seems like an evolutionary process. He has concisely discussed in detail the gradual changes in how the public should review the mistakes of doctors. As portrayed by his writing skills, the subtopics that constitute his essay follow a step-by-step procedure in which the readers find ease in following. Gawande has used a remorseful tone to persuade readers. Through the use of the strategy, the writer has made the readers guilty of their past medical mistakes. The writer honestly proves to the readers that the misconceived habits about medical errors are not entirely deserved. Because the readers discover that most of the written things aren’t new, they take a keen interest in the message and are easy to convince. In the essay, the writers specified that court decisions naively draft some guidelines that advocated for punishing the doctors. Gawande writes that they were not the right recommendation and shouldn’t have been made. Through remorse tone, he acknowledges that the level of understanding of the mistakes was so stumpy such that it had affected the decisions of most of the doctors in making an independent medical decision. Gawande has tried to excuse the medical profession through writing. Moreover, he takes into consideration the public who are likely bombarded with information by the media. He acknowledges that some mistakes did almost unavoidable.

Strategies and Styles Employed bySinger: What should a billionaire give?

In the context, Singer portrays his argument regarding the obligations that the rich have as far as supporting the impoverished people in society. Besides, Singer has made some essential aspects, particularly in developing an argument that seeks to establish the world as a private entity that needs charity as well as donations, an element that cannot be achieved by the government. In his argument, Singer makes outstanding efforts through ridiculing the activities and behaviors of the society to be conformed in the manner that alleviates third-world poverty. Singers identify that this can be achieved by merely valuing all human life equally and further denotes that Kravinsky is the right model to achieve this provision. Singer’s critique on Kravinsky is a unique strategy employed in the justification of the value of the lives of our children that is presumed to be far much better than the value that is way better than the value placed on the lives of children of strangers. On this account, Singer praises Kravinsky following his declaration that he would allow his child to die for the sake of saving the other two as a way of promoting utilitarianism. The above provision is also enhanced by the inquisitive nature of Singer, who tries to seek the value of human life and presumes that no price tag can be associated with it. The symbolic of signifying that human life is of great worth, and at no circumstance, it can be quantified. Furthermore, Singer also presumes that in case human value is to be quantified, It would be associated with millions that are inconsistent with the foundations of democracy as well as the belief of the inherent dignity of human beings that presumes we are all equal. The argument forms a fundamental basis on the social as well as a political philosophy. The interconnection shows clearly the differences in sex, nationality, ethnicity, and place influence the value of human life.

Singer bears the opinion that people should be in a position to give out the money that they have hardly worked to have earned, and to enhance this, he uses particular examples to appeal to the reader. These examples were correct and at some point, made them think that they were irrelevant to the argument of whether or not people would give their money counter to their wishes.”…people can only earn large amounts of money under favorable social circumstances” (342). While stating this statement, he did not mean it to be a fact but an opinion that, for one to make a large sum of money, can be easier when one is living in circumstances that are favorable socially. Nevertheless, this was not a must while on the other hand, this statement to different persons everyone has his definition of a large amount of money as there lies a considerable variation in wealth and poverty.

The Comparison between the Styles Employed

Comparatively, the two writers have used different styles and strategies to influence the decision of their readers. Gawande’s approaches to writing are full of remorse language, which tries to justify the situation that is faced by the doctors as they undertake their duties. It is through the remorse language that he appeals to the public that some mistakes done by the professionals aren’t readily available. Besides, a writer has used sarcastic language to correct the misconception of the people. Using the knowledge imparted by the media, he makes the public aware that it is not through lawsuits that sanity is to be reclaimed in the profession. Sometimes it is better to understand the information we conceive from the media.

On the other hand, Singer has used the approach of ridiculing to pass his message to the readers. Singer ridicules the behavior of society and suggests that it should be corrected and aimed at alleviating poverty by all means. The writer has also employed the method of critiquing, which has worked so well to bring out the idea of human equality. The critiquing method is achieved by basing his arguments on Kravinsky to bring out the contrast of ideologies they posses.

Conclusion

The different strategies and styles employed by the writers are essential in creating a writer-reader connection. Depending on the theme of the essay, every writer has the task of assessing which strategy best fits their audience. Besides, it is important to leverage the strategies of writing as a writer because they reduce misunderstanding and misconception by the readers.