Court Case of Helen of (Troy)

Court Case of Helen of (Troy)

In this case, it is worth developing personal insights to prosecute Helen of Troy. The actions of her unwomanly nature prompt the start of the war that destroys Troy. Moreover, the adultery charges that have been brought about by Helen’s husband, King Menelaus, are evident and worth contributing to the war. Therefore, it is right to establish that the court case that is established against Helen makes her be found guilty of the various actions that she has engaged in society. It is created in Greek Mythology that Helen was the most beautiful woman in the world who was married to the King of Sparta. However, the adulterous nature that is brought pout through her actions that lead to the abduction by Paris can be portrayed as the significant cause of the Trojan war (Minchin 162). The numerous attempts by the Achaeans are focused on conducting her reclamation. The main reason is that Helen, in this case, is believed to be the daughter Leda and Zeus. The primary reason for the judgment is the evidence that reveals on Helen’s willingness to leave Menelaus to be with Paris. Consequently, it is reasonable to maintain that in the court case of Helen of Troy, it is correct to develop judgment against Helen that reveals her as being guilty based on her willingness to be with Paris and adulterous nature that lead to the war of Trojans.

Helen is depicted as being guilty through the fact that she agrees to leave her Hermione and husband, Menelaus, for Paris. Even though there exist thoughts that Helen was abducted by Paris leading to the actions of committing infidelity against Menelaus, there exists evidence that extends to reveal that she was connected to the willingness of being with Paris. The case, therefore, that has been brought about by her husband finds her guilty of the actions as she is the root cause of the destruction of Troy. Helen is not responsible for the actions that she has conducted. For instance, she betrays the motherly nature by leaving behind the nine-year-old daughter without having the thoughts of coming back (Homer 91). The Trojans move to demand Helen back is what infuriates the war leading to the destruction of Troy.

She plays a significant role in the war as she seems to have passively led to the war. On the other hand, the actions that prompted Paris to appoint Zeus to judge Aphrodite further relate to reveal the guilty nature of Helen. Aphrodite is depicted to have promised Paris, the most beautiful woman in the region, by ruling in her favor. Therefore, Aphrodite is portrayed to initiate in presenting Helen with gifts for purposes of luring her to be with Paris (Kraft 165). The actions of Helen to accept and willingly leave her husband behind make her guilty of the adulterous and destruction of Troy claims presented by Menelaus in the case. Hence, it is right to state that Helen is guilty of the claims that have been made against by Menelaus through her actions to be with Paris and leading to Achaeans fight to reclaim her back to their land.

The charges that Helen destroys women of Troy, as revealed in Euripides’ “Tragedy of Women of Troy,” it is worth ascertaining that Helen is guilty. Euripides presents the thoughts about how Helen distances her self during the war of the Trojans as she is in Egypt, together with Paris (Holmberg 34). Furthermore, the women that survive the death war claim that Helen’s nature to act unwomanly by being unfaithful to her husband and further leaving her daughter behind prompted the destruction of Troy.

Moreover, she seems less affected by the war after Hermes had taken her to Egypt. As the wife to King Menelaus, Helen ought to have returned to Troy during the Trojan war to promote the end of the war. However, Helen stays in Egypt during the entire war, although she is the reason that has resulted in the war as the Achaeans are searching to reclaim her back after discovering that she is the daughter of Zeus and Leda. In association with the judgment made against Helen, the case of Clytemnestra, Helen’s sister can be used to substantiate the reason that has been developed in the case. Clytemnestra seems responsible for her actions and taking part in the numerous murders. However, in the case of Helen, as portrayed in Homer’s “Iliad,” she fails to account for her actions of being adulterous (Homer 135). The firm stays in Egypt with Paris provokes her husband that further results in the start of the Trojan war.

The marital loyalty issues are well elaborated in Homeric Iliad. In the poem, Homer reveals that Helen seems less concerned about the actions that led to her leaving behind her daughter in Troy. However, the Iliad extends to build on the fact that Menelaus’ unfaithful wife is the central point behind his actions to convince King of Mycenae to lead an expedition to reclaim Helen. Agamemnon, a brother of Menelaus, is joined with heroes such as Odysseus that fight in the Trojan war (Kraft 166). In this case, the root cause for the battle is the fact that Menelaus is greatly affected by the war and resorts to think about how he can reclaim her. Moreover, the abduction of Helen by Paris is developed in Homer’s Iliad as the cause of the war. Contrary to this, it is correct to discover that Helen seems not to have been forcefully taken from Menelaus. According to Euripides, in the play, Helen, it is apparent that Aphrodite offers Helen to Paris in favor of the rulings (Allan 221). She presented her with several gifts that finally make her feel convinced and ready to be with Paris. This is probably through how Helen is portrayed to have associated with the events of leaving her daughter behind (Holmberg 39). Hence, in the case against Helen, it is right to depict that she is guilty of having destroyed the women of Troy through her adulterous act.

In conclusion, both Homer’s Iliad and Euripides’ Helen reveal on the evidence that Helen is guilty in the charges that have been brought out by her husband, Menelaus. Helen willingly accepts to leave Menelaus and her daughter behind to be with Paris, as presented in the Iliad. Moreover, Helen does not seem concerned about the Trojan war as she stays in Egypt through the events of the war. The comparison with Clytemnestra builds on her failure to facilitate the end of the war. Moreover, Helen’s is the root cause of the war as her husband manages to convince his brother Agamemnon to lead an expedition to reclaim her. Therefore, it is correct to ascertain that the claims presented by Menelaus result to Helen being guilty.