Critical Analysis Essay


Persuasion is a powerful tool that can transform human life. In free societies, persuasion is used to point out issues that are controversial and advocate for action concerning a particular issue. For example, gun violence in America has been on the rise, and people are calling for gun control laws. The “March for Our Lives” movement was born on February 14th, 2018. The movement was launched in response to an incident at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland Florida, where a 19-year-old gunman shot indiscriminately for six minutes using an automatic assault weapon. The incident sparked outrage leading to the creation of the movement, which carried out demonstrations even in Washington DC led by the survivors of that fatal attack. The movement aimed to petition lawmakers to provide a gun control legislation that would make American schools safer. In this paper, I critically analyze the persuasive strategies used by the “March for Our Lives” movement and the implications for American society.

The overall message of this persuasive example

The overall message of the “March for Our Lives” movement is to petition the government to pass laws that ban assault weapons, raise the age of gun ownership, stop the sale of high capacity magazines and strictly regulate the amount of ammunition easily available. Thirdly the movement aims at pressurizing the government to put in place checks and effective laws that will make background checks mandatory on every gun purchase. The movement is a student-led demonstration to support gun control legislation. The first rally of the movement took place on March 18th 2018, with similar marches taking place in 880 destinations around the US and the globe. The march was estimated to have involved around 2 million demonstrators in the United States. The debate about gun control laws has been going on without much concrete progress as they only occur after major shootings and loss of lives in the hands of indiscriminate gunmen. The movement hopes to pressure the government to enact gun control laws that are more effective at limiting mass shootings.

The persuasive strategies and appeals used

The persuasive strategies used in the movement aim at creating awareness about gun violence, influencing public support, and developing rapport with similarly minded organizations to seek an audience with the government and policymakers. The use of pathos logos and ethos is evident in the movement’s messages. The use of ethos is seen when Cameron Kasky, a survivor of the Florida attacks, talks about the need to develop legislation in the area. The democrats who support stricter gun laws also voiced their support of the initiatives, including Barrack Obama and Elizabeth Warren. The use of logos is evident when the movement talks about 1200 children losing their lives since the Parkland shooting. This allows the public to see that it is a problem that affects all Americans across the political divide and needs urgent action. Pathos is also evidently used in the movement’s messages through emotive survivor stories telling of their horrifying ordeals during the attack day. In one instance, Cameron Casky states that the movement is a way of students begging for their lives. This creates emotion and outrage against gun violence that leads to the killing of children.

The message’s intended audience

The message of the group is intended mainly for policymakers and the government in general. However, the media is a key player as it helps in spreading information in real-time about the movement and the issue being advocated for. The main objective is to create public pressure to petition the government to enact stricter gun laws. The stakeholders in the security and education sector are also targeted in the movement. Fellow students, teachers, first responders, and security personnel are all affected by gun violence, and thus the movement aims to win their support. Students from elementary school to colleges to portray and depict that they do not feel safe at all in American schools. The policymakers are also targeted because they can use their status in society to join hands and enact stricter policies that will reduce incidents of gun violence in American schools. The general public has also been a victim in past incidents is also targeted in the campaigns as it gives the movement more bargaining power and influence towards positive social change.

The extent this is an “effective” message

The message is effective because it has resulted in wide participation, and it has pressured the relevant stakeholders into a debate. According to the National rifle association, guns are not the cause of death but sick individuals. At the same time, the movement has been calling out policymakers to regulate guns in order to control gun violence. I believe that the presence of a conversation is the first strategy for resolving the problem. The message is effective because similar campaigns have become common such as the national school walkout. The network for public education has also encouraged people to take action to pressure lawmakers to enact stricter gun laws. This can be done through sit-ins, rallies, and demonstrations to create more attention. The message of the “March for Our Lives” movement is effective because the message speaks to a wide audience that is affected by a similar fate before. Every parent is not easy when they know the lives of their children can be easily snatched away by a gunman.

The implications of this persuasive message

The implication for this movement is that the government will have to heed to the calls of the students by enacting a policy that will enhance safety in American schools. The lone gunman incidents are not just in schools but in public as well, such as San Bernardino shooting. The implication is better cooperation between stakeholders in the security and education sectors to develop better policies that enhance school safety. The conversation on gun violence allows Americans to keep exercising their first amendment rights. The student-driven activism could be a tipping point in the gun debate. As Cameron Kasky puts it, the students are literally “begging for their lives” because of increased and incessant gun violence against innocent students. The movement message will most likely lead to a ban on assault weapons, enhance stricter use of guns, and put in place checks and balances in every gun purchase.

The persuasive message is ethical

The March for Our Lives movement meets all ethical standards because it is a social movement against evil in society that anyone can decide to join or not. It is not compulsory, and people have a choice. However, ethical concerns have always been raised about whether the issue is about guns in the first place. A section of the society thinks the movement is based on lies and misinformed facts because it is not the gun that kills people, but people kill others. However, the movement’s argument is legitimate because the government has not done enough to ensure the safety of schools and prevent the rising cases of radicalization and mental illnesses. Perhaps it is a result of both causes. However, a common ground should be reached to regulate gun control issues better while at the same time, ensuring that mental issues or radicalization is detected early and mitigated. The message meets the ethical threshold because the students are expressing their thoughts about the problem, and indeed their perspective should be taken into consideration.

What the message tell us about who we are as a society

The movement’s message brings into light how society needs each other to solve a problem. However, at the end of the day, society’s needs must be looked at objectively and solved fairly to prevent exacerbation of the problem. The movement recognizes that it needs public support to achieve its objectives. This is why the message is tailor-made to target a certain section of the society, develop public sympathy and support towards a more positive course. This defines human relations and behavior because unless the message is tailor-made, the problem cannot be perceived in an objective way. The role of persuasive communication is to develop a message in a way that will make the listener support and change their thoughts about a particular position. In this case, the issue of gun laws is mainly political. The movement is trying to reach out to Republican lawmakers, moderates, and politically neutral parties to join the cause. Otherwise, without effective communication and polishing the message to suit public interest, the movement would most likely lose its meaning and attract public backlash or lack support.


The March for Our Lives movement effectively uses persuasion to develop government, policymakers, public, and other stakeholder support concerning stricter gun laws. The campaign continues to advocate for more sustainable solutions to avoid knee jerk reactions when another attack occurs. The movement’s message is full of pathos, logos, and ethos to win the hearts of the public using emotion, facts, and credibility of their position. Being first-hand survivors if the horrific incident, the students have been able to play a significant role in the broader movement that supports stricter gun laws. While opponents have called their messaging unethical, in my view, they rightly propagate an agenda that affects them. Others should also use their persuasion techniques to develop better and more effective policies that will create a safe society.



You can buy critical essay from us and relieve your academic stress

Our Stats


0 +

Writers Active


Av. Quality Score


Writers Online


Why Choose studygroom?

We not only promise a 24/7 support availability and timely delivery of all your papers. You also get a ton of other asuarances that our service comes with.


Satisfaction guarantee.


100% original papers.

Money Back

The grade or money back.


We protect your privacy.

What is a critical essay?

A critical essay is a written work that provides a detailed analysis of a subject. It contains a thesis statement and a series of arguments that support the thesis.

A critical essay is usually written to express one’s opinion about the presented work. It is usually done by analyzing the text and drawing conclusions based on what it has to say.

Critical essays are popular because they allow individuals to examine the world around them with a mature perspective that emphasizes understanding and knowledge.

A critical essay is a piece of writing that analyzes a work from many different perspectives. The writer measures the text against what they believe to be the standards of literary quality. This paper will discuss how a critical essay might be used in higher education and the workplace.

The purposes of using critical essays in higher education and the workplace are to allow students or employees to understand a text better, evaluate arguments, and take ownership over their learning journeys.

Critical analysis essay topics

Critical analysis essay topics are generally used to analyze, interpret, evaluate, and judge the value of an individual or an object.

A critical analysis of the significance of democracy across time would be a good example of how to write on this type of essay topic.

Critical analysis is a literary genre that comments on the work of a particular author. It is a form of literary analysis. Critical essays are often found in literary criticism and history books.

In this context, you will find critical essay topics that will help you improve your critical thinking skills and write better essays for your university or college assignments.

Critical analysis essays are written to provide a well-founded, detailed summarization of an argument. They are usually analytical and provide the reader with an alternate perspective on an issue.

The introduction is meant to introduce the essay topic and keywords.

Critical analysis essays for college essays help students distinguish themselves from the rest of the crowd. But what are these topics? Here are some examples:

The role of culture in social change

Why do we need to fight climate change?

Most universities teach students about writing critical analysis essays. These essays are usually done in memoirs, literature reviews, research papers, news articles, or personal experiences. Critical analysis essay topics are generally very difficult to find through searching online since the topics are so vast.

Some of the most popular and common topics for different types of essays include:

– Self-critique: Personal reflection on past experiences, mistakes, and achievements

– Academic critique: Academic paper critiques other scholars’ work

– Professional Critique: Critical analysis of a professional or academic field.

– Social Critique: Critical analysis of society and culture, such as race relations, class issues, sexual orientation.

Culture critical thinking topics

Culture critical thinking topics are not about evaluating cultural constructions or understanding them to make sense to the majority of people. It is about taking the time to understand cross-cultural interactions and use these insights in professional settings.

Culture, or more specifically, culture critical thinking, refers to the process of examining the values, norms, meanings, and consequences created by cultural interactions.

It can be very useful when dealing with other cultures in professional settings. Many benefits come with being able to successfully engage in culture critical thinking practices, according to research. Some of these include being more creative in ones work and improve future career prospects.

Mass media topics

Mass media critical analysis essay topics can range from psychoanalyzing a particular character in a film, analyzing gender politics in a particular medium, or analyzing how mass media affects society.

Mass media critical analysis essay topics can be challenging to choose from because there are so many to choose from. Some examples of topics are:

Psychoanalyzing a particular character in a film: Princess Leia from Star Wars- A feminist icon who is not only strong and independent but has been written as a strong female role model for many generations.

Analyzing the gender politics in a particular medium: Disney Channel- Disney Channel is one of Disney’s television channels created for children, and it has been targeted by girls since its creation. It is mainly aimed at women but changed to target both genders

Critical evaluation topics on history

In history, there are a lot of topics that need to be covered. It is crucial for historians to be critical in their work to not fall into the trap of biased narratives. This paper provides a list of some topics which would require critical evaluation from historians.

This is an article about how critical evaluation questions might be applied to history. The article poses four questions that might be relevant to historians or artists interested in historical topics. These questions are: what is the purpose of this work; what positions does it take; how does it convey these positions; and what problems it raises?

How to write a critical analysis


Writing a critical analysis is a skill that comes with time and practice. To help you get started, we’ve created a structure for you to follow.

Introduction: Critical analysis is the process of examining and evaluating an issue or problem, which can be applied to any number of topics such as literature, social science, business, or other subjects.

The process of writing a critical analysis can be easily broken down into three basic steps: identifying the issue, analyzing the issue, and drawing conclusions from your analysis.

Hi, my name is Jenn 👋

In case you can’t find a sample example, our professional writers are ready to help you with writing your own paper. All you need to do is fill out a short form and submit an order

Check Out the Form
Need Help?
Dont be shy to ask