Dashboard Analysis and Relative Nursing Plan

Dashboard Analysis and Relative Nursing Plan

            The primary purpose of this particular paper is to effectively focus on quarterly Dashboard-base of a specific inpatient rehab-based unit. The presented information involves data concerning nurses’ sensitive quality indicators, which include; pressure ulcers assessed within 24 hours, the total number of falls, and patients subjected to risks on fall protocols. Also, RN care-based hours, data interpretation, and generate a nursing care plan on low scoring areas explicitly based on sound (best) practices. Besides, included is a nurse based sensitive patient satisfaction surveys indicators. The indicators include; RN courtesy, attention subjected to individual needs, promptness, response plans, instruct homes, and well-care coordinators.

In past years, opinion-based and experience-abased practice forms have factually proved to be harmful or bear ineffectiveness, hence opting for the utilization of evidences-based medicines (Leape, Berwick, & Bates, 2018). This paper, in particular, will effectively provide an in-depth analysis based on the selected areas of performance that require improvement. The article is going to discuss statistical discoveries and the primary reason why the said area was chosen.

Analysis of the Dashboard

Utilization of the provided information obtained from National Data Nursing Quality Indicators (NDNQI) assists healthcare institutions to provide better health care services to patients. Moreover, NDNQI is categorized as one of the wealthiest database associated with nursing performances throughout the country. Every member hospital of NDNQI has the ability to identify site coordinators, whose main task is to act as the primary linking contact point for every activity related to NDNQI. The primary site coordinator associated with NDNQI serves a crucial role whereby he or she ensures all data reporting and collection adhere to all guidelines provided by NDNQI (NDNQI, 2015).

Functional performing areas and opportunity improvement areas are thoroughly analyzed through effective use of the dashboard (Garrard, 2016). Benchmarking perpetual researches concerned with evidence-steered practices causes improvements in pursuit of outstanding competitive performance with the same supplemental hospitals in confidential contexts. Therefore, benchmarking becomes a crucial element in the above-stated process. Current pay-for- performances demonstration projects and reporting public initiatives funded by the Centre for Medicare and Medicaid’s Services represents a report-card based strategy. The strategy shows how hospital performances are judged through external-based constituents that incorporate performance improvement initiatives. Nurses unit-specific indicators, overall indicators, patient-based satisfaction surveys indicators, and NDNQI data.

Similarly, the general data showcased improved overtime performances. This improvement involves thorough descriptions of the selected performing area that requires improvement. This particular paper will specifically include statistical discoveries and the primary reason for choosing the area.

Pressure ulcers showed a significant worsening trend in the last quarter. This condition will be the primary focus discussed in the formulated nursing care plan. The nurse’s sensitive satisfactions surveys indicators proved general improvement heading into the third-based quarter, having a decline in the previous quarter. Similarly, total falls showed higher targets than pressure ulcers targets. Patients who got subjected to pressure ulcer assessments within 24 hours based on point prevalence’s estimates showed significant increases in the previous quarter.

Falls

            The data obtained from the dashboard showed a result that presented an increase in total falls in the last quarter over its target. Therefore, falls are an essential area based on performance that requires improvement. Similarly, “best practices” get explained as those processes of care that are explicitly based on expert opinions and literature and represent excellent ways known that can prevent falls in hospitals. Falls are viewed as informal events that showcase the adverse effects experienced in patients present in hospitals. These adverse events (falls) pose significant challenges to the quality of health care rendered to patients. The reduction of falls is identified explicitly as patient-based safety priorities in the U.S. (National Priorities Partnership, 2011).

As falls possess tremendous impacts on patients, they also have direct adverse effects on the healthcare institution costs on cases and lengths of stay. The patient’s general functionality declines, and an increase in healthcare institutions use are as a result of falls. Even though falls won’t cause serious injuries, they may lead to patients requiring triple placements in skilled nursing facilities.

Pressure Ulcers

            Besides falls, another poorly performing indicator as per the information presented on the dashboard is pressure ulcers. The incidence and prevalence rates of the ulcer, coupled up with treatment cost, constitute a substantial primary burden for the healthcare system. A study in 2008 showed that the Centre for Medicare and Medicaid’s Services made significant announcements that they would not cater to any additional costs attracted to pressure ulcers acquired from hospitals. The total cost of a single-stage IV or III pressure ulcer may range between $6,000 and $51,000. And the prices depend on co-morbidities. The quality care that is specifically aimed at minimizing and preventing pressure ulcers and skin breakdowns got identified as a special nursing-based research priority. As per the said dashboard, incidences of pressure ulcers showed a definite increase over the previous quarter.

Nursing Plan