Different explanation to Causes of climate change

Different explanation to Causes of climate change

Climate change

Climate change has been a controversial issue, mainly because people can see the change in the environment globally. Climate change has affected the vegetation cover in the United States, where wildfires burn millions of acres across the country. The impact of these wildfires can be attributed to many factors such as industrial and occupational structures component in a particular region such as Los Angeles. The fact that this part of the country has been experinci9ng massive wildfires shows the risk it possesses to the environment and the people in general. The wildfires have been prompted due to human activities such as construction sites, industries that emit dangerous gases, and the increase in the number of private vehicles in the city. To explore the reasons for the prevalence of wildfire in Los Angeles, we have to look at the potential hazards or influences that might be facilitating these wildfires in this part of the United States. Climate change has facilitated the rise in wildfires in Los Angeles because of carbon emission, the limitation to urban green coverage, the amount of resources pumped to mitigating these wildfires, minimal reforestation, and the increase in public transport effects in the city and how they lead to environmental degradation.

Carbon emissions define life in urban areas where this dangerous gas is a byproduct of the primary activities that take place in the city. Los Angeles is a large city with the existence of global industries in the area. The carbon emissions in the most wildfire-prone areas such AS Santa Paula, San Bernardino, West Los Angeles, Jurupa Valley, and Fullerton are prevalent. These areas are populated with many people owning private motor vehicles. The change in freeway in Los Angeles has contributed to the increase in the number of private cars, which increases the amount of carbon emissions in the environment. Barboza (2019) claims that “Californians are driving more, and vehicle ownership rates are on the rise.” According to the author, there is a surge in the number of vehicles in the city, which can be blamed for the increase in carbon emissions in the environment. The carbon emissions contribute to climate change, which makes the global temperature to rise because they trap solar energy in the atmosphere. The consequences of trapping solar energy trigger changes in weather patterns, which increase the amount of heat in the atmosphere, thus increasing the chances of wildfires in Los Angeles. The increase in temperature in Los Angeles has made the weather-related incidences such as the numerous fires because of the severe weather. The rise in carbon emissions has been influenced by the significant number of people coming to the urban centers. According to Badger (2016) “In 1920, for the first time, the Census Bureau counted more people living in urbanized America than in the countryside”. This shows that the Americans have for a long time preferred to live in major cities than on rural areas. This has triggered the ballooning of human activities such as industries which in turn increased the amount of carbon emissions in the atmosphere. Carbon emissions, especially from the vehicles, have directly affected the atmosphere, which has contributed to change in weather patterns, thus making the city’s atmosphere rise, rising the many incidences of wildfires.

Minimal reforestation investigates the extent of urban greening and whether densely populated areas have an impact on urban pollution. Los Angeles is a region that is populated with diversity in terms of income, ethnic, and racial come in place to define how the social structures in place affect the prevalence of environmental degradation, thus prompting wildfires. Financial Times (2018) claims that “Mr. Trump has blamed California’s latest fires on poor forest management.” According to the author, the sentiments made by the president show that he does not understand the cause of wildfires in the region because the same places have experienced these hazards several times. Assuming that there is more than planting trees to curb the issue of fires in Los Angeles is the first step in reducing climate change in the area. Investigating the extent of urban greening, however, is a significant factor that explains the environmental change in these areas and how they have influenced wildfires. Urban greening is an influential factor when it comes to defining how the environment around us, and thus reforestation should be maximized to make sure that most of the city contains trees/green vegetation. Urban greening helps in combating air and noise pollution, control flooding, and calming traffic. There is still hope that we can save nature just by planting trees, which can be done by reforestation (One Tree Planted, 2019). According to the author, planting more trees will ensure urban greening, thus cooling the hot temperature in Los Angeles, thus limiting the prevalence of wildfires. The information offers a solution of wildfires in Los Angeles, which is influenced by the fact air flows equatorward, which enhances negative vorticity, which leads to further drying of most parts of Southern California. This explains why reforestation can be a solution when it comes to controlling the fires in Los Angeles because that is the only way to reach an equilibrium when the surface friction happens, which slows drying. Reforestation can be a determining factor in why certain areas in Los Angeles experience wildfires more than others because a place where there is a substantial amount of urban green then there is a possibility that the temperature will be balanced, thus limiting wildfires.

Resource allocation has also played an integral part when it comes to dealing with wildfires in Los Angeles and, more explicitly, covering the broad area of the environment. The government has significantly invested resources into mitigating the wildfires in Los Angeles, which have become disastrous over the years, leading to loss of property and lives. The national government, however, has failed to cover the issue with integrity as they always place temporary solutions such as holding campaigns to sensitize the residents on how to stay safe if a wildfire erupts. However, formulating laws that make sure the issue of environmental degradation is put in place and enforced is the only way to curb the wildfires in this part of the country. According to Spivack (2019) “The most dramatic measure would require buildings of more than 25,000 square feet—which are responsible for 30 percent of the city’s carbon emissions—to conduct retrofits”. The author points out that there are substantial measures that can be adopted by the government when it comes to mitigating environmental degradation. In Los Angeles the government needs to out in place laws that ensures that wildfires are minimized or eliminated altogether so as to avoid any national disasters that are prevalent in this area in terms of deadly wildfires. Allocating enough resources makes sure that the local authority can be able to put in place measures that ensure that no human life is lost in these prone wildfire areas which will go a long way in ensuring the residents can be taught on various ways to prevent wildfires. During wildfires, a lot of resources are depleted in dealing with the disaster and construction of houses or properties after being consumed in the wildfires. The limited allocation of funds by the government has seen some residents volunteering and willing to pay high taxes to the states if the wildfires can be reduced. According to Summers et al. (2019), “In 2017, nearly 9,000 wildfires ravaged California, burning 1.2 million acres of land, destroying more than 10,800 structures, and killing at least 46 people.” The author explains that the intensity of a wildfire is so large that it requires a significant amount of money to be pumped to mitigating the spread of the fire and compensating the affected victims. The government has been given this responsibility by the public but to end this prone menace there is a need for a consensus effort by everyone living in Los Angeles to chip in and help in minimizing the wildfire accidents so as to avert a situation where resources allocated to other important projects are consumed in containing wildfires. The parts that have been associated with prone wildfires in Los Angeles has exacerbates the inequality when it comes to the income level of the residents. This has been witnessed where people in L.A have gone for months homeless after a wildfire while others could be able to hire private firefighters and rebuild fast. The income disparity has been a determining factor on how wildfire crisis is handled where the low income households have to wait for government interventions. Schwartz (2018) claims that “climate change stands out as one of the greatest challenges for cities around the world”. To the author, most cities in the United States are prone to major disasters, which are mostly caused by human activities. In a populated city such as Los Angeles where the number of people activities continues to rise, it might be hard to control wildfires because of income disparities or other social factors such as race and ethnicity. The different elements in Los Angeles make it hard for the government to keep allocating resources, which it claims is human-generated, and it is up to the residents to come up with ways to reduce wildfire incidences. The minimal resources allocated to fighting the wildfires become a hindrance to achieving full control of the environmental crisis because the smokes and fumes from the burning millions of acres emit carbon emissions, thus making the temperature even higher. If the government, stakeholders, and the residents can come together in allocating resources to permanent solutions to mitigating wildfires like increasing urban green in Loa Angeles van help eradicate the prevalent wildfires in the area.

An increase in public transportation is another massive factor that has increased wildfires ion Los Angles. The city is basically lively and densely populated, which makes it contain a significant number of motor vehicles and, more specifically, private cars. The cars usually burn gasoline, which is emitted in the air through fumes. Still, it can get worse if the fuel does not burn completely because it leads to carbon monoxide emission, which is catastrophic when it comes to the environment. The vast number of vehicles in L.A suburbs can cause dangerous illnesses and, more specifically, raise the temperatures in the city, thus prompting wildfires. Cooper and Sedgwick claims that “The size of a population, along with its growth and decline, will affect an area’s standard of living, levels of consumption, environmental footprint, infrastructure needs, and more” (2). According to the author a city that is populated has a high chance of dealing with environmental degradation due to resources exhaustion. The population diversity also plays an integral part where if the ethnic community living in the area are less concerned with their environment than their jobs are likely to experience environmental-related incidences. In Los Angeles, the business class is more concerned with making profits in expense to developing environmental friendly neighborhoods. The industrial and occupational structures present in the city have become a place of destruction with people opting to build less expensive houses because of the prevalent wildfires in the suburbs. In the cases of a wildfires in the suburbs many people are ordered to leave their homes which affects a wealthy and technologically advanced city like Los Angeles. This has become a disaster to the residents who have to reconstruct every time a wildfire ravishes their homes. To people with low incomes it has become even more hard to live in L.A because they keep losing all their saving periodically. Reducing the number of vehicles in the city can go a long way in reducing the emissions of carbon monoxide and thus decreasing the severe high temperature in the city. Los Angeles is a dry place, and an increase in temperature triggers destructive fires that end up burning millions of acres and living people homeless and more impoverished. The fact that these coincidences have become a norm in this part of United States and the measured taken have not become effective outlawing the number of vehicle a family owns help in reducing CO2 in the air. The negative impact of many cars in L.A translates to the many people living in this part of the country. According to The Times Editorial Board Los Angeles Times (2018) “a total of 34,189 people were homeless in the city, including about 9,000 who spend nights in shelters”. This shows that many people in the area had been left homeless by the prevalent wildfires, and it became hard to get their lives in place ever again. The effects of wildfire are enormous, and dealing with such retrenched and vulnerable population has made it clear that environment solutions have to be adopted fast to avoid the increasing number of homeless residents.

Environmental degradation in Los Angeles can be minimized or eliminated if the government and the resident can include measures such as planting a tree, reducing carbon emissions, allocating enough resources to fire mitigation and fight and making sure there is substantial urban greening through reforestation to reduce the high temperature in this area. There are many methods this can be achieved, but one driving factor for the wildfire is the environmental changes in the area, which can be attributed to human activities. The solutions provided will go a long way in ensuring that no more loss of property or innocent lives. Adopting the green economy will help the government plans the revenue correctly, which will help in improving other social basic needs such as healthcare. The number of homeless people in the area is enormous, and putting this measure will ensure that the wildfire will seize burning down their houses, thus improving the standards of living in the area.