Do scientists have a moral obligation to use chemistry for purposes like the one stated above? Why or why not?
The scientists have a moral obligation to use chemistry for the purpose of detecting proper liver function. This is because it is their duty to come up with the solution for real-world problems. For instance, it will be of great significance to the developing countries where diagnosis cost is relatively high; however, with the paper-based, numerous people will be able to test their liver function. Considering the majority of the persons living in developing countries suffer from a liver-related illness, the paper-based measuring device will solve such cases.
How else can chemistry be used to make a positive impact on the world?
Chemistry can be used to assist in understanding, monitoring, protecting, as well as improving the environment. Chemistry can be used to develop tools and techniques to ensure we see and measure water and air pollution. Moreover, it can aid in building evidence that indicates how climate will change over time. Chemistry can also be used as part of the exertion to comprehend and address new issues that we are likely to face, such as microplastics, as well as the potential impacts of the diverse chemicals the world are currently exposed to. A detailed perception of pollutants, in addition to their chemistry, can also be used to interpret health effects, regulate emission besides developing pollution-reducing technologies.
How might chemistry be misused to have a negative impact? What measures can scientists put in place to remove that threat?
Chemistry might be misused to have a negative impact precisely on warfare. The test and use of nuclear weapons have an adverse effect on the environment (Liska et al. 25). Moreover, it can lead to long-lasting impacts on the health of people and animals as well as fatalities where it might be used. The scientists can put in place measures to neutralize the reagents used to make nuclear weapons to remove such a threat.