DSM-5
In the report, Diagnosis Disorder: A Radical BehaviourAlternative, it asserts that the DSM-5 may pose specific problems that may hinder its success in diagnosing personality disorders. Sentiments by Koerner et al. provide reasons as to why the DSM-5 may not be a useful tool in diagnosing personality disorders. Nevertheless, it is fundamental that some diagnostic systems are of immense value and worth to be kept as effective diagnostic systems.
In the long run, some diagnostic systems such as the DSM -5 may be a practical and useful system in diagnosing personality disorders. However, Koerner et al. assert that the relevance of DSM -5 as the trait-based diagnostic system is problematic. In other words, Koerner et al. suggest that the lack of accounting various symptoms and relative importance traits as a symptom in diagnosing personality behaviors may limit its success in its work as a useful diagnostic system. Don't use plagiarised sources.Get your custom essay just from $11/page
Even though the DSM -5 exhibits its problems, I would recommend it as a useful diagnostic system. Specific principles held by DSM -5 in its diagnostic process is of immense value. Due to evidence that pinpoints that there is insufficient knowledge on mental health—such limitations in the mental health fraternity results in a flawed classification system in the DSM-5. Secondly, evidence pinpoints that attempts in classifying mental disorders are not that effective. Specific classification systems based on classifying personality disorders in central to brain biology, psychological dimensions of personality, and on development of the mind are not useful in diagnosing personality disorders in the contemporary world.
Moreover, sentiments from psychological societies on the notion of treating the person and not the disease is problematic. Evidence indicates that it is not easy to research the use of this notion. For instance, it is not feasible to conduct a diagnosis of a large number of schizophrenia patients on every individual. Sustainable strategies of the use of a pre-determined criterion should be based on the disease and what constitutes schizophrenia.
All in all, the DSM-5 is worthy of being considered as a useful diagnostic system. Specific reasons such as insufficient knowledge, challenges in classifying mental disorders suggest that there are no diagnostic systems that are capable of being constructed entirely. Besides, this indicates that the diagnostic systems also exhibit their fair share of problems, it is my notion in creating my diagnostic system that would look like the DSM-5, and that there is value in keeping some diagnostic systems like the DSM-5.