Effective Strategy to Prevent and Manage the Hurricane Katrina Natural Disaster

Effective Strategy to Prevent and Manage the Hurricane Katrina Natural Disaster

Introduction

Significantly noted that though Katrina occurred approximately 15 years ago, it’s also indicated by incident Command System (ICS) since of its most significant impact on the people that were displaced, the death toll and property destruction. However, on August 23, 2005, Hurricane Katrina created as a tropical storm on the coast of Bahamas. In more than seven days, the tropical storm catastrophic hurricane that led to landfall for the first time in Florida then subsequently on the Gulf Coast in Mississippi, Louisiana, and Alabama, creating vast devastation heartbreaking and people suffering.in addition, Katrina impacted on physical destruction, flooded the historic city of New Orleans, that causes over 1,300 people deaths, that signified the most destructive natural American history disaster.

The sheer ferocity of nature depicted a considerable disappointment and devastation at the blame went to the ”government” local, state, and Federal due to the inability to respond effectively to the disaster. This scenario exposed the flaws of Federal, State, and Local preparedness for catastrophic emergency and the capacity to respond. Because of the issue, the President commanded a clear review of the federal response to Hurricane Katrina for the sake of the Nation to discover rapid changes for reliable preparation for any challenge of the same nature to Hurricane Katrina lessons learned.

What went wrong and what went well at local states and federal levels

Specifically, the complexity of the general response to Hurricane Katrina is not complex to identify. Hurricane Katrina comprises of 115 -130 mph winds, and consist of storm surge. It’s made a dept. Of 27 feet of the northern Gulf Coast from Mobile, Alabama, to New Orleans, affected approximately 93,000 square miles of the Nation the size of Great Britain. The impact was not particularly to one city or town or an estate. The individual states plans and local as well as new ideas, as well new plans made by the Federal government because the terrorist attack on September 11, 2001, adequately failed to justify the widespread of the catastrophes.

Importantly the images of the destroyed towns and cities, particularly with their perspective. In this case, the smaller towns like Waveland, Mississippi, were damaged by Hurrican Katrina and required a more modest scale with abrupt search and recovery effort as well as the vast capacity of life-saving and reliable commodities. For instance, the largest city like New Orleans,that dominated a lot of what American watched on televisions –affected from the first impact of Katrina as they followed by the subsequent flood which caused by breaches.

Lessons learned from Hurricane Katrina about the ICS structure and natural disasters.

Additionally, after thorough review and assessment of Hurricane Katrina, an indication of seventeen particular lessons, the federal government has learned. These specific lessons flow from the critical challenges that we faced, out of fourteen of these challenges range from high –the level of planning issues and policy such as integration of military capacities to operate matters i.e., search and rescue. These entail homeland security development and education, community preparedness –which interrelate to others but reflect measures and institutions that better our readiness more widely.

However, these seventeen vital complexities impacted all aspects of the federal response, while others have an impact on a specific operational ability. Hence when accumulatively taken, it’s directly changing the overall effective measures.  However, the departments of homeland security and defense must together plan for the department of defense’s support of federal response activities as well as those extreme situations. Again the lesson learned should be the focus of coordination of state and local governments and the private sector that should assist in developing modern, flexible, and transparent systems of logistics. This system must focus on developing contracts for stockpiling commodities at the local level for the provision of goods and emergency services.

Conclusively the Homeland security, with the support of technology policy, should establish a National Emergency Communication Strategy that stand as the interoperability and operability.

Lessons learned from Hurricane Katrina about the ICS structure and natural disasters.

The private sector plays a significant role in responding and recovery of disaster. As for the private sector, they have a broader purpose, such as emergency –relief activities, as they partner with insurance companies that provide insurance coverage and compensation of the loss. Also, the private sector works hand in hand with a community organization to restore a neighborhood to offer immediate economic assistance for households and families. The private sector is also essential in providing direct services such as financial counseling, health services, and household support to affected constituents.

Notably, disaster recovery needs inclusivity and various kind of funding, most of which the private sector can distribute effectively than the government sector can do. However, the vital role for the private sector in disaster recovery, there are still shortcomings discussion concerning how and where the private entity should contribute, since the processes are justified for when the private sector should engage, and whether there is any real clarity about if individual sector contributions with help to offset shortfalls as households and the entire communities emerge from the disaster recovery.

Recommend strategies to improve private sector effectiveness.

Despite the measures put in place by the private sector in recovery and responding to the disaster, there are critical recommendations that are essential to improve the private sector’s effectiveness in responding to natural disasters. In this scenario, effective disaster risk reduction calls for community participation. The participation of communities in planning and implementing activities assist in ensuring that they are well connected to the real situation and the need required by people. This notification helps to avoid future occurrence effects when a hazard event occurs. In this case, participatory approaches can be most effective in available indigenous capacities. By incorporation of local approach into decision making greatly assist in ensuring that changes in vulnerability and perspective decision.

Also, the state has the sole responsibility for implementing strategies established to reduce disaster risk. Disaster risk requires being an essential part of a state’s focus to sustain developments. The private sector would be able to implement alone strategies; it requires efforts from other different stakeholders, including international organizations, civil society.

Also, the multi-hazard approach can reduce and improve effectiveness. When a particular community is often exposed to such hazards. The aftermath result cumulative risk cannot be iron out effectively if stakeholders plan to focus only on the hazardous event. This multi-hazard approach entails translating and connecting knowledge of analyzed –the range of hazards into risk management and disaster. Although it will not perceive as natural hazards inclusive of other factors such as  political strategies, public understanding, technical analysis, and operational capacities.this policies will eventually lead to the highest effectiveness in achieving the set goals

Also, capacity developments are a critical strategy for reducing risk. These strategies require to build and sustain the ability of people, societies, and organizations to manage risk successfully themselves. This need not only training or technical assistance, but it requires the strengthening of capacities of communities and individuals to recognize the risk by themselves.

Finally, Contingency planning is the best strategy since it is a management tool used to examine the impact of potential risks and ensuring that enough and appropriate prior measures are made to respond in the right time, effective manner to the event on the affected population. This strategy is among the best since it’s used as the planning tool to anticipate and solve problems that typically emerged in the process of humanitarian response.

.