Electoral College
Elections provide opportunities for educators and parents to discuss with young adults about the electoral process, politics, civics and role of government. Studies show that in Presidential elections, hatred culminates, bullying intensifies, and biased proposed assumptions form part and parcel of the political arena. Electoral College is questioned, with citizens demanding accurate and relevant data. This paper presents how systems of elections like the Electoral College are biased.
In the past, elections of presidents and vice presidents were simple. However, the introduction of the Electoral College led to the bias of running elections. First, the Electoral College assumed that citizens were less skilled to determine the best candidate for president. The author notes that making general assumptions that citizens are unable to make the right presidential choices limits their freedom to choose the leaders they want.Secondly, the Electoral College allows presidents who have amassed majority votes. This is a bias because not every count of people gets to be reflected in this system. Sampling necessitates unfairness as only a small population gets to be represented in the totality of votes.
In article two, bias emanates in the form of abolishment. It assumes that if the Electoral College is dealt away with, new amendments would be made in the federal government. The author assumes alteration in the electoral system will entirely change the overall results of federalism. The article also shows that a candidate with the most number of votes takes the administrative role. From my point of view, the bias exists because of the belief that the federal system has been in existence from time immemorial and served the forefathers well.