EVIDENCE ANALYSIS
The essay provided contains theoretical evidence which is lightly tackled without any substation facts to validate them. The essay takes about Kensal rise that is being closed but does not provide any reason for the cause and consequences. Instead, it concentrates of the option of friends of the library joining support to run the library. The paper talks about Willes Green being sacrificed due to opportunity for a lubricious deal but fails to describe the conditions that the allegations are true or not, this makes the content of the essay to be baseless.
However, the essay tackles different types of libraries and claims that well-managed libraries are receiving a high volume of visitors while other is exactly the opposite. This is a good argument from the essay but does not include a few examples to affirm the reality. This makes the idea to lack meaning and what it speaks may not concur to the real-life situation. The essay blames the online library users to be the main cause of Kensal rise closure but does not mention any arguments which directly connect the two. Despite the writer of the essay claiming that the library gets over three million visitors daily, it is still neglect, the author does not provide any evidence that is associated with the inattention.
The essay ends in a high note arguing people to defend the existing libraries; the author has several claims about motives and intentions to eliminate libraries. However, most of the claims have no affirmative remarks, supporting examples and descriptions that will ensure they show evidence. Most of the content lacks the influence of their topics and remain as mentions without elaborations to help the ready understand and take a position on the subject.