Explain how Kant sees the Relationship between morality, law and human freedom
According to Kant, the connection between morality, law, and liberty are that morality condemns restricting of the freedom of innocent law or moral agent and that just as it condemns killing of innocent law and moral agents, it causes pain or instead reduces freedom abilities. In other words, Immanuel Kant discusses how the moral code helps an individual feel free as a person and, therefore, as linked to the notion of autonomy, freedom is conjoined to the law that one has morally created (Kant, Immanuel, 49). Thus, it is a civil commitment that one has to comply with fully. Kant defines freedom as an act of governing one’s action not based on desire but reason according to the law. Therefore, it is crucial to liberate freedom as opposed to the enslavement of one’s desire. The law requires us to be moral, and freedom universalizability should strive to account for the law.
Indeed, Kant’s explanation of the relationship between morality, law, and human freedom is a critical piece in explaining why the code is a threat to democracy as one has to live morally upright. Generally, without moral principles, one cannot make the right choices, which would further lead to happiness or success (Kennington, Richard, ed, 41). Moreover, as moral value is connected to ethical values, Kant’s theory is sifted to vague senses in morality, law, and human freedom, which are connected to how people should treat each other. Human beings are expected to be categorical, beneficence, and non-maleficence, which initiates values of aspects to great lifelike respect, justice, and honesty.