fear memories require protein synthesis in the amygdala for reconsolidation after retrieval
The review should be concise: between 800 and 1000 words. This word count includes a reference list at the end. Reviews longer than 1000 words. The review should include an initial paragraph that introduces the central problem addressed by the study. This paragraph should set up the problem by citing and briefly reviewing relevant 2-4 other primary research articles. A good way to find these articles is to look at work cited in the introduction of the paper you’re reviewing. Please use in-text journal-style citations (e.g., Smith and Murphy, 2010) with a reference list at the end. The body of the review (2-3 paragraphs) will be a detailed desсrіption of the study: What was the aim of the study in relation to the problem laid out in the introduction?[unique_solution] What did the researchers do? What methods did they use? Who were the participants? What were the independent and dependent variables? What did the researchers find? Be as clear as you can when you describe the methods and the results so that they are understandable to a wide audience. In a concluding paragraph, state why the finding is relevant to cognition, anything you think is problematic about the study, and suggest directions for future research or applications. The review should be concise: between 800 and 1000 words. This word count includes a reference list at the end. Reviews longer than 1000 words. The review should include an initial paragraph that introduces the central problem addressed by the study. This paragraph should set up the problem by citing and briefly reviewing relevant 2-4 other primary research articles. A good way to find these articles is to look at work cited in the introduction of the paper you’re reviewing. Please use in-text journal-style citations (e.g., Smith and Murphy, 2010) with a reference list at the end. The body of the review (2-3 paragraphs) will be a detailed desсrіption of the study: What was the aim of the study in relation to the problem laid out in the introduction? What did the researchers do? What methods did they use? Who were the participants? What were the independent and dependent variables? What did the researchers find? Be as clear as you can when you describe the methods and the results so that they are understandable to a wide audience. In a concluding paragraph, state why the finding is relevant to cognition, anything you think is problematic about the study, and suggest directions for future research or applications.