Forensic Science
INSTRUCTIONS: The recent officer-involved fatal shooting of Antwon Rose in East Pittsburgh has gained national attention. In this case, the officer was charged by way of a general category of “criminal homicide” under Pennsylvania law. Let’s examine this case from a scientific and objective perspective and leave the emotional aspects, however legitimate, outside of this. Let′s suffice it to say that a tragedy did indeed occur, but how might forensic science be able to assist us in terms of gaining deeper knowledge in regard to: 1) The culpability of Rose, if at all, in regard to the initial drive-by shooting in North Braddock (and why this may or may not be relevant); and 2) The felonious conduct, if any, by the officer in regard to the shooting. [unique_solution]For this assignment, NOTES: **READ ABOUT THE SHOOTING. “East Pittsburgh Officer Michael Rosfeld charged in shooting death of unarmed teen Antwon Rose”. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-nation/wp/2018/06/27/east-pittsburgh-police-officer-who-shot-and-killed-antwon-rose-charged-with-criminal-homicide/?noredirect＝on&utm_term＝.7ea0e29de973 You should include in your writings citations to newspapers including those that are online. Other citations should be to scholarly works as well as Pa. Cons. Stat. and relevant Pennsylvania court cases. ***Approach this assignment as if you are an independent evaluator. Look it from the point of “ Using forensic science evidence to explain what happened? Approach this in a scientific and objective perspective. No personal feelings/Emotions Support each paragraph with forensic science evidence, the law, scholar cases, Articles, online Newspapers etc.