Government ideology and economic policymaking in the United States
Introduction
The influence of politics on policy and other government and administration processes is immense. In this article, Potrafke addresses the influence of a government’s ideology on the economic policymaking process. The introduction analyzes the election arena in America – it does this to create a comparative element that then leads one to have clarity in analyzing the issue of ideology and economic planning and policy.
Methodology
The methodology of research involves the analysis of various results of individual studies, government ideology measures, samples, and dependent variables. Various elements that are analyzed include fiscal and monetary policies, policies that explain the gap in gross domestic product (GDP) growth gap, among others, as the article seeks to evaluate the influence that political ideology imposes on policymaking. The article bases on reviewed data that cuts across the national, state, and levels.
Results
The results indicate that, indeed, political ideology does affect the policymaking process. The influence of parties tends to reduce as one moves to lower governments – with the local government experiencing the least impact. The article highlights that democratic presidents tend to generate better rates of economic growth compared to republican presidents – although studies fail to identify the causal effect (Potrafke, 2017). Political leaders will often use economic grounds to justify budgetary practices and decisions – which are often ideology induced.
Discussion
Potrafke notes that parties that hold contrasting political ideologies often implement similar policies (Potrafke, 2017). Potrafke does a great job of presenting and analyzing the economics-politics dynamic at various government levels. The ordinary citizen is reflected upon with various related issues that affect them being highlighted. The article presents an insightful perspective that highlights the influence of politics and other related ideologies on the policymaking process – which includes fiscal planning, among others.
Conclusion
In conclusion, it is critical to understand the crucial interaction of policy and research and its influence on administrative activities and processes. Citizens often suffer the consequences of inadequate exposure and comprehension of these vital factors. The analysis and study by Potrafke provide the much-needed insight for a proper understanding of the concept.